2010
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00041210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox in pneumococcal serotypes: highly invasive does not mean highly lethal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Serotypes 1, 5, and 7F have been described as having high potential for invasiveness (these serotypes are carried for a short time) but are associated with milder disease and lower CFRs ( 7 , 9 , 19 , 34 ). As in those studies, we found that serotypes 1 and 5 caused IPD but were not associated with death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Serotypes 1, 5, and 7F have been described as having high potential for invasiveness (these serotypes are carried for a short time) but are associated with milder disease and lower CFRs ( 7 , 9 , 19 , 34 ). As in those studies, we found that serotypes 1 and 5 caused IPD but were not associated with death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that so-called “highly invasive” serotypes (including 4, 1, 14, 18C, and 7F), convey a higher risk for invasive disease than do the “low invasive” serotypes (including 3, 15B/C, and 6B), which are more frequently isolated as colonizers ( 7 ). Furthermore, serotype distribution varies with patient age, both in disease and in nasopharyngeal colonization ( 2 , 8 10 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site is always considered a pathogen, recovery from a respiratory site may represent colonization. Despite these limitations, the role of surveillance that is not limited to isolates causing invasive disease is shown by recent studies reporting high case-fatality rates for noninvasive serotypes ( 15 17 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En trabajos previos se ha mencionado que los pacientes con mayor riesgo de muerte fueron los que presentaron infección por los serotipos más prevalentes en portadores 29 . Algunos serotipos, como el 3, están asociados con alta letalidad, pero hay serotipos con bajo poder invasivo y gran letalidad y morbimortalidad 30 . En la muestra que presentamos en este estudio, a pesar de lo que dice la literatura no se evidenció la relación entre los serotipos más frecuentes (3, 7F, 11A, 14, 19A y 22F) y el fallecimiento.…”
Section: G Modelunclassified