2013
DOI: 10.1038/srep02835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of enrichment in phytoplankton by induced competitive interactions

Abstract: The biodiversity loss of phytoplankton with eutrophication has been reported in many aquatic ecosystems, e.g., water pollution and red tides. This phenomenon seems similar, but different from the paradox of enrichment via trophic interactions, e.g., predator-prey systems. We here propose the paradox of enrichment by induced competitive interactions using multiple contact process (a lattice Lotka-Volterra competition model). Simulation results demonstrate how eutrophication invokes more competitions in a compet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a tree-based simulation model, Takenaka showed that the diversity of tree species is clearly affected by seedling establishment rate 14 . However, Takenaka’s model is an example of a lottery model 15 16 17 18 19 that will result to competitive exclusion if taken to sufficiently long time frames while our model can maintain stable coexistence given the same time frame, which is the major difference between our studies. Takenaka’s model is in line with prominent studies relating spatial heterogeneity and coexistence such as those of Chesson, Muko and Iwasa which are mostly based on a lottery model for sessile organisms 16 17 18 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Using a tree-based simulation model, Takenaka showed that the diversity of tree species is clearly affected by seedling establishment rate 14 . However, Takenaka’s model is an example of a lottery model 15 16 17 18 19 that will result to competitive exclusion if taken to sufficiently long time frames while our model can maintain stable coexistence given the same time frame, which is the major difference between our studies. Takenaka’s model is in line with prominent studies relating spatial heterogeneity and coexistence such as those of Chesson, Muko and Iwasa which are mostly based on a lottery model for sessile organisms 16 17 18 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, cooperative or synergistic interactions result in richer phase diagrams, which may include discontinuous phase transitions, and have been a topic of intense research [5,6,[14][15][16][17][18]. Cooperation and competition have been investigated on multi-species interacting models in distinct ecological contexts [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Particularly, symbiotic interactions were recently investigated in a two-species contact process (2SCP) [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this result suggests, habitat heterogeneity as it relates to the fitness of an individual has a great impact on the life history strategy and/or biodiversity. However, there are almost no studies that incorporate the spatial niche effect, except that of Tubay et al [42] , who investigated the biodiversity of phytoplankton in an aquatic ecosystem. It would therefore be useful to investigate biodiversity in an ecosystem with spatial heterogeneity, as opposed to in uniform (neutral) ecosystems [43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%