2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradox of Muscle Hypertrophy in Muscular Dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
76
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
7
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to objective measurements, as reported previously [13], serial interpolation over the entire length of the muscle more accurately predicted effects than mid-muscle belly analysis. Consistent with our prior pathologic studies [35], GRMD dogs showed markedly progressive absolute muscle volume loss in six of the seven muscles studied, with the only exception being the CS, which undergoes paradoxical hypertrophy in CS [21] (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With regard to objective measurements, as reported previously [13], serial interpolation over the entire length of the muscle more accurately predicted effects than mid-muscle belly analysis. Consistent with our prior pathologic studies [35], GRMD dogs showed markedly progressive absolute muscle volume loss in six of the seven muscles studied, with the only exception being the CS, which undergoes paradoxical hypertrophy in CS [21] (Fig. 4A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…7 Because it was difficult to differentiate connective tissue or fat from tongue tissue in the ultrasound examination, we could not discriminate "tongue pseudohypertrophy" from increased connective tissue or fat in the tongue. However, an enlarged tongue will cause poor bolus formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various animal models have accelerated the advances in understanding of the path physiology of muscular dystrophy and allowed the progress of some promising approaches to therapy [29,30,31,32]. However, these animal models have species-specific differences in their clinical courses and phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%