2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of solid waste management: A regulatory discourse from Sub-Saharan Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is informed by critical institutionalism and is based on the recommendation from Muheirwe et al ( 2022 ) of the need to investigate the relevance of regulation for actors in informal settlements. The solid waste regulatory framework for Kampala City, Uganda, is examined to understand what enables or constrains actors’ participation and collaboration in the provision of waste collection activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is informed by critical institutionalism and is based on the recommendation from Muheirwe et al ( 2022 ) of the need to investigate the relevance of regulation for actors in informal settlements. The solid waste regulatory framework for Kampala City, Uganda, is examined to understand what enables or constrains actors’ participation and collaboration in the provision of waste collection activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dlamini et al indicated that these policies cover a set of efforts to tackle enhancements for environmental and public health quality. Nonetheless, despite the legal importance and quality, the law's enactment per se does not guarantee improvements in solid waste management [53].…”
Section: Waste Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods focus on the effectiveness and outcomes of solid waste management, while the underlying factors that influence the performance are not well evaluated. Some previous efforts highlight the decision-making contexts, such as policy and regulation perspectives, and are accountable for the sustainable performance of waste management [29][30][31][32]. Indicators involved in the assessment should reflect concerns related to social, economic, environmental, and policy domains [20,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%