The Paradoxes of Community‐based Participation in Dar es Salaam

Abstract

The current discourse and practice of international development rest on the assumption that community‐based participation is an essential component of efforts to facilitate change across the global South. Such participation is thought not only to ensure efficiency and sustainability, but also to accelerate broader structural transformation by empowering individuals to exercise agency in relation to development. This article seeks to contribute to critical participation studies by analysing the broader processes and structures that shape participatory opportunities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The author argues that by promoting community‐based organizations (CBOs), national and transnational development actors have produced and legitimated a system of popular participation that, in contrast to their claims, disempowers local citizens. Paradoxically, these CBOs have further contributed to the exclusion of the majority of community actors.

Towards a Theory of Local Governance and Public Goods Provision

“…The energies of leaders were diverted into activities that could be justified in aid funding reports at the expense of the objectives and solidarities with which the movement started out. Several of the same themes recur in Dill's (2009) The 2009 APPP research amplified several of these concerns. Our fieldwork has not so far touched upon social division and exclusion as an effect of the framing of self-help in an associational mode, partly because we are not focusing on projects as such.…”

Engaging with feminist postcolonial concerns through participatory action research and intersectionality

“…Using them in an extractive way has rather disempowered than empowered people and created paternalism instead of ownership in many research and development projects (Dill, 2009). On many occasions, participatory approaches have resulted instead in processes of recolonisation: new hierarchies were created and it was mainly the development agencies, in the hope of realising the "perfect" development project, that benefitted from the time and resources invested by the communities -in terms of public image, but also in terms of money and power (Kapoor, 2005).…”

Using street theatre to increase awareness of and reduce mercury pollution in the artisanal gold mining sector: a case from Zimbabwe

“…In addition, when vulnerable community members speak out, they can expose themselves to the rancor of those whose interests are challenged. Furthermore, despite official rhetoric, donor agencies can be ambivalent toward politically troublesome, open community dialog (Bamberger, 1991;Michener, 1998;Mansuri and Rao, 2004;Platteau, 2004;Dill, 2009).…”