2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.07.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The parallel π–π stacking: a model study with MP2 and DFT methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46,52] In fact, systematic DFT studies on intermolecular binding of benzene dimer predict weak attractive or repulsive interactions. [45][46] As in previous findings, the interaction energies of benzene dimer and benzene-methane adduct computed at our density functional level are À5.5 and À4.1 kJ mol…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[46,52] In fact, systematic DFT studies on intermolecular binding of benzene dimer predict weak attractive or repulsive interactions. [45][46] As in previous findings, the interaction energies of benzene dimer and benzene-methane adduct computed at our density functional level are À5.5 and À4.1 kJ mol…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…26 It has been shown that TDDFT can predict the lowest energy excited states in aromatic aggregates due to the correct description of molecular orbitals. [27][28][29][30] Density functional theory (DFT) cannot completely describe all aspects that contribute to the potential energy surface in π-bound systems, but recently, several studies have predicted reasonable structures for π-π and C-Htπ systems. 31,32 DFT is an attractive choice due to its computational efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ab initio results have found density functional theory (DFT) to be not completely satisfactory for π -stacking [22][23][24]. Tauer and Sherrill [22] have examined π-π interactions for benzene dimers and trimers and they observed that Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) used with small basis sets tend to have errors that cancel each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%