2019
DOI: 10.1137/18m1168704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Parameterized Complexity of Finding a 2-Sphere in a Simplicial Complex

Abstract: We consider the problem of finding a subcomplex K of a simplicial complex K such that K is homeomorphic to the 2-dimensional sphere, S 2 . We study two variants of this problem. The first asks if there exists such a K with at most k triangles, and we show that this variant is W[1]-hard and, assuming ETH, admits no O(n o( √ k) ) time algorithm. We also give an algorithm that is tight with regards to this lower bound. The second problem is the dual of the first, and asks if K can be found by removing at most k t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show the d = 2 case, and the higher dimensions follow again by taking the suspension, which changes the solution size linearly by doubling once for each suspension. It may be possible to prove this result with a modified argument based on the parameterized reduction from the Grid Tiling problem to the 2-Sphere Recognition problem in [17]. Here, we present a completely different reduction from the α×β-Clique problem defined below, as this gives us further hardness results for when the MBC d problem is parameterized with respect to both solution size and maximum coface degree (see Section 4.2.3).…”
Section: Solution Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show the d = 2 case, and the higher dimensions follow again by taking the suspension, which changes the solution size linearly by doubling once for each suspension. It may be possible to prove this result with a modified argument based on the parameterized reduction from the Grid Tiling problem to the 2-Sphere Recognition problem in [17]. Here, we present a completely different reduction from the α×β-Clique problem defined below, as this gives us further hardness results for when the MBC d problem is parameterized with respect to both solution size and maximum coface degree (see Section 4.2.3).…”
Section: Solution Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There might be a better parameterized algorithm than the one presented in this paper. In particular, we have the ETH-tight 2 O(k) n O( √ k) -time algorithm from Theorem 2 of B. Burton et al [17] that can recognize if a simplicial complex of size n contains a 2-sphere of size (at most) k as a sub-complex. This is interesting, because this problem is similar to the MBC 2 problem while also having a runtime close to what we are aiming for.…”
Section: Solution Size and Coface Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivanov showed 2-Dim-Sphere is NP-hard [27]. Burton, Cabello, Kratsch, and Pettersson showed 2-Dim-Sphere is W [1]-Hard when parameterized by the number of 2-simplices of the sphere [8]. Burton, Cabello, Kratsch, and Pettersson also gave an algorithm for 2-Dim-Sphere that runs in 2 O(t) n O( √ t) time, where t is the number of triangles in the sphere.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, it has been used to study the parameterized complexity of Steiner Tree in planar graphs [17,18]. The problem is also starting to be applied outside the strictly geometric setting: in computational topology [19] and for studying H -free graphs [20]. Our Theorem 2 is using gadgetry similar to other reductions in geometric intersection graphs, but it is ultimately a more standard reduction from the 3-SAT problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%