1970
DOI: 10.2307/1441652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Parasitic Copepod Diet and Life History of Diskfishes (Echeneidae)

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 192.231.Stomach contents from 401 individuals representing six species of echeneids were examined. Parasitic copepods are an important part of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that attaching to mobile hosts benefits the remoras by reducing metabolic demands for swimming (Muir and Buckley, 1967), offering opportunistic feeding (Strasburg, 1962) or increasing the chance of finding mates (Silva and Sazima, 2003). Remoras have been known to strongly attach to sharks (Ritter, 2002;Ritter and Brunnschweiler, 2003), rays (Williams et al, 2003), other pelagic fish (Williams et al, 2003), sea turtles (Sazima and Grossman, 2006), dolphins (Weihs et al, 2007), divers (Silva and Sazima, 2003), buoys (Cressey and Lachner, 1970), ship hulls (Cressey and Lachner, 1970) and concrete (Strasburg, 1962). This variety of hosts moves at many different speeds and have body surfaces that span a broad spectrum of geometries and topologies (Stote et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that attaching to mobile hosts benefits the remoras by reducing metabolic demands for swimming (Muir and Buckley, 1967), offering opportunistic feeding (Strasburg, 1962) or increasing the chance of finding mates (Silva and Sazima, 2003). Remoras have been known to strongly attach to sharks (Ritter, 2002;Ritter and Brunnschweiler, 2003), rays (Williams et al, 2003), other pelagic fish (Williams et al, 2003), sea turtles (Sazima and Grossman, 2006), dolphins (Weihs et al, 2007), divers (Silva and Sazima, 2003), buoys (Cressey and Lachner, 1970), ship hulls (Cressey and Lachner, 1970) and concrete (Strasburg, 1962). This variety of hosts moves at many different speeds and have body surfaces that span a broad spectrum of geometries and topologies (Stote et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remoras or diskfishes (Echeneidae) attach to several types of marine vertebrates, from sharks to cetaceans (Cressey and Lachner, 1970;Fertl and Landry, 1999). Remoras may benefit from this association in several ways, such as ride, feeding, and protection from predators (Strasburg, 1959;Cressey and Lachner, 1970;Alling, 1985;Katona & Whitehead, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remoras may benefit from this association in several ways, such as ride, feeding, and protection from predators (Strasburg, 1959;Cressey and Lachner, 1970;Alling, 1985;Katona & Whitehead, 1988). Whereas some diskfish species attach to a broad array of hosts, other species are prone to attach to particular host types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jumping by blacktip sharks Carcharhinus limbatus has been proposed as a means of dislodging attached echeneid sharksuckers Echeneis naucrates (Ritter, 2002;Ritter and Brunschweiler, 2003). Remoras are considered hydrodynamic parasites as they potentially disrupt the flow over the dolphin's body and add to the drag, although remoras can be beneficial in clearing parasites (Cressey and Lachner, 1970;Moyle and Cech, 1988;O'Toole, 2002). The sucking disc of remoras is a modified dorsal fin with slat-like transverse ridges, which are modified spines (Moyle and Cech, 1988).…”
Section: Measurements As Fr=l/(g) For 858mentioning
confidence: 99%