The
furanic chemical 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF) is an attractive biobased
fuel and feedstock. High-yield biphasic processes for DMF synthesis
from sugars employ higher alcohols such as n-butanol
(BuOH) as solvents. This leads to a product containing <8 wt %
DMF and byproducts in the BuOH solvent along with water. DMF process
economics are dominated by separation costs for DMF purification and
recycle of BuOH and water. We previously demonstrated efficient adsorptive
separation of DMF with a stable ZIF-8 metal–organic framework
adsorbent. Here, we present a detailed, comparative technoeconomic
analysis and sustainability indicators of adsorptive versus conventional
distillation separation processes to produce 98 wt % pure DMF at 100
metric tons/day. The novel adsorptive process integrates a simulated
moving bed (SMB) unit with water removal and desorbent recovery systems,
whereas the distillation process relies on multiple columns operating
at different pressures to handle the strongly nonideal multicomponent
thermodynamics. Rigorous process modeling is conducted by a combination
of the Aspen Plus flowsheet simulation package and our in-house SMB
modeling and optimization package, with realistic multicomponent adsorption
and vapor–liquid equilibrium models parametrized by experimental
data. This is followed by detailed calculations and sensitivity analysis
of bare-module, utility, and material costs. The net present values
(NPVs) of the process alternatives show a clear long-term economic
advantage of the adsorptive process, mainly due to large reduction
in utility costs. For a 100 MTD DMF plant, the ΔNPV for adsorptive
separation is strongly positive (>$6M at a 10% discount rate and
15-year
operation) and remains competitive over a large range of sensitivity
factors. When translated to a large potential DMF biofuel market size
similar to that of bioethanol, the SMB-based adsorptive process would
save >$8B/yr. globally in separation costs. Furthermore, the novel
adsorptive process has much better sustainability indicators, including
41% lower process energy intensity and 37% lower process CO2 emissions, as well as a number of qualitatively determined environmental
and safety advantages.