2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Parity Paradox: Reader Response to Minority Newsroom Staffing

Abstract: The topic of newspaper newsroom diversity has been studied in terms of staffing levels, impact of minority staffing on editorial content, and the failure of newspapers to attract minority readers. However, no studies have been conducted that compared minority staffing levels with circulation and survey data indicating minority community readership and trust in newspapers. Through a secondary analysis of data from four sources, this study finds that minority staffing levels do not correlate with increased subsc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on minority journalists' perceptions, we can infer that mainstream norms constrain minority journalists so that they are limited in their ability to enhance the news reports on minorities, lending further evidence to assertions that a diverse newsroom does not always result in better or more coverage of minorities (Adams & Cleary, 2006;Ankney & Procopio, 2003;Steele, 1994). Moreover, these findings imply that there is an ''illusion of inclusion'' in the mainstream newsroom (Wilson, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on minority journalists' perceptions, we can infer that mainstream norms constrain minority journalists so that they are limited in their ability to enhance the news reports on minorities, lending further evidence to assertions that a diverse newsroom does not always result in better or more coverage of minorities (Adams & Cleary, 2006;Ankney & Procopio, 2003;Steele, 1994). Moreover, these findings imply that there is an ''illusion of inclusion'' in the mainstream newsroom (Wilson, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, readership is not likely to improve at newspapers with a more diverse staff. Adams and Cleary (2006) found no significant link between an increase in minorities in the newsroom and an increase in newspaper subscriptions, readership, and expressions of trust. Minority journalists working for mainstream newspapers suggest that several obstacles remain in the effort to diversify the newsroom, such as the perception that diversity is not an important news value and the lack of minorities in power positions (Johnston & Flamiano, 2007; see also Rivas-Rodriguez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As Adams and Cleary (2006) point out, the issue of newsroom diversity has been explored since the 1960s, mainly in the form of descriptions of staffing levels in newsrooms and hiring, retention, and promotion issues (Bodinger-de Uriarte & Valgeirsson, 2015;B. Clark, 2017;Meyers & Gayle, 2015).…”
Section: Minority Journalists and Race-related Issue Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical legacy of racism, prejudice, and discrimination even impacts racial minorities themselves whereby the increased minority staffing in newsrooms even affects the trust of audiences of color. They too have internalized some version of white supremacy and the inadequacy of minority media employees (Adams & Cleary, ). Problems also stem from racialized stereotypes of the public that occur in newsrooms and the invisibility of racial minorities in media policy discussions.…”
Section: The Historical Exclusion Of Minorities In Communications Polmentioning
confidence: 99%