2011
DOI: 10.19030/rbis.v15i4.6011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Partnership Of EDGAR Online And XBRL - Should Compustat Care?

Abstract: Until EDGAR Online began operational, Compustat was (arguably) the only provider of financial statement information with accompanying database development capabilities. While EDGAR Online has received relatively little attention in the literature to date, we posit that the use of Edgar Online could flourish given the recent XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) reporting mandate of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). In this regard, we identify the differences between Compustat and EDGAR Onli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean profitability of their investment strategies produced excess return of 4.74% in the first year and 1.24% in the second year [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Replication Of Ou and Penman (1989)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean profitability of their investment strategies produced excess return of 4.74% in the first year and 1.24% in the second year [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Replication Of Ou and Penman (1989)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tallapally et al [11] compared the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) of 26 firms retrieved from Compustat and EDGAR Online in 2009. They found that, among 26 firms, the COGS amounts of 23 companies were reported lower in Compustat than in EDGAR Online, whereas two companies showed the opposite values; however, they failed to identify the fundamental causes of the differences.…”
Section: Unexplainable Coding Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kinney and Swanson [9] found differences in tax items between Compustat and firms' financial statements, but failed to identify the causes of the differences. Yang et al [11] also found unknown errors in several items (e.g., net sales, inventory, and gross plant) and argued that these errors were unexplained coding errors.…”
Section: Unexplainable Coding Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2010). In addition, the reliability of COMPUSTAT has also been questioned, prior studies have shown that COMPUSTAT data may differ from the original corporate financial data (San Miguel 1977;Kinney and Swanson 1993;Tallapally, Luehlfing, and Motha 2011) and data found in other accounting databases (Rosenberg and Houglet 1974;Yang, Vasarhelyi and Liu 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%