1944
DOI: 10.1177/00220345440230040101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pathogenesis of Enamel Hypoplasia: an Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enamel hypoplasia was not recorded in this study, although such defects in humans are thought to indicate disruptions in enamel formation that may be associated with systemic stress from specific or nonspecific infections or nutritional deficiencies (Giro, 1947;Kreshover, 1940Kreshover, , 1944Mellander et al, 1982;Sarnat and Schour, 1941). Although other researchers have ex-amined enamel hypoplasia in apes (Skinner, 1986;Vitzthum and Wikander, 19881, such analysis was viewed as beyond the scope of this study since the evaluation of macroscopic enamel defects in nonhuman primates is not straightforward.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Enamel hypoplasia was not recorded in this study, although such defects in humans are thought to indicate disruptions in enamel formation that may be associated with systemic stress from specific or nonspecific infections or nutritional deficiencies (Giro, 1947;Kreshover, 1940Kreshover, , 1944Mellander et al, 1982;Sarnat and Schour, 1941). Although other researchers have ex-amined enamel hypoplasia in apes (Skinner, 1986;Vitzthum and Wikander, 19881, such analysis was viewed as beyond the scope of this study since the evaluation of macroscopic enamel defects in nonhuman primates is not straightforward.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition to genetic variation, primate odontogenesis is subject to environmental effects including physiological stresses due to fetal and childhood disease and poor nutrition as well as food toughness, that manifest phenotypically in the structural composition of tooth tissues (Sarnat and Schour, 1941;Kreshover, 1944;Guatelli-Steinberg, 1998, tooth size (Townsend and Brown, 1978;Townsend, 1980;Dempsey and Townsend, 2001), and occlusion differences (Corruccini et al, 1990). Under-standing the factors that regulate or affect ontogenetic schedules, for example, epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and sources of temporal instructions, will better equip workers to distinguish variables that significantly affect or drive evolutionary changes in the dentition.…”
Section: Model For Coordinated Mandibular and Lower Dental Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 is the dentin-enamel junction and the underlying dentin. Figure 3 (20,27,34,49). Because of the continuous eruption, rat incisors are able to register disturbances in the functions of ameloblasts and odontoblasts leading to changes in the enamel and dentin, respectively (26,36,40 imparted by a pigment normally produced by ameloblasts (6).…”
Section: The Microscopic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%