2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-015-0664-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pattern of EU FDI in the manufacturing industry: What role do third country effects and trade policies play?

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to assess the impact of "third country effects" and trade policies on the outward stocks of FDI of the EU. We estimate a model based on the knowledge-capital theory of the multinational enterprise over the period 1995-2008 by using a sample of five EU countries and 24 partner countries. Explanatory variables include an index of applied bilateral tariffs, a dummy to capture the presence of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and a variable to take into account the impact of the partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second argument concerns the expected reduction in intrabloc FDI, as firms seek to capture economies of scale by concentrating activities and then benefitting from free trade to service the different national markets. Here, the theoretical predictions concerning a reduction in intra-EU FDI turned out to be somewhat wide of the mark; see for example Cantwell (1987) or more recently Cardamone and Scoppola (2015). This essentially is because the theoretical analysis failed to consider fully the relative importance of a reduction in the costs of co-ordinating activities across locations within a customs union, compared with the economies-of-scale effects in production.…”
Section: Foreign Direct Investment and Customs Union Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second argument concerns the expected reduction in intrabloc FDI, as firms seek to capture economies of scale by concentrating activities and then benefitting from free trade to service the different national markets. Here, the theoretical predictions concerning a reduction in intra-EU FDI turned out to be somewhat wide of the mark; see for example Cantwell (1987) or more recently Cardamone and Scoppola (2015). This essentially is because the theoretical analysis failed to consider fully the relative importance of a reduction in the costs of co-ordinating activities across locations within a customs union, compared with the economies-of-scale effects in production.…”
Section: Foreign Direct Investment and Customs Union Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second argument concerns the expected reduction in intrabloc FDI, as firms seek to capture economies of scale by concentrating activities and then benefitting from free trade to service the different national markets. Here, the theoretical predictions concerning a reduction in intra-EU FDI turned out to be somewhat wide of the mark; see for example Cantwell (1987) or more recently Cardamone and Scoppola (2015). This essentially is because the theoretical analysis failed to consider fully the relative importance of a reduction in the costs of coordinating activities across locations within a customs union, compared with the economies-of-scale effects in production.…”
Section: Fdi and Customs Union Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using gross outflows only would ignore gaining or losing chances for jobs from the attraction of inward FDI. Using industry or firm data instead would not be informative in regard to the question whether some firm's or industry's disadvantage is compensated by another one's advantage leaving the country level possibly unaffected or statistically insignificant because of heterogeneity of firms and industries (Cardamone and Scoppola 2015).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%