2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
133
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
133
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the developmental stages of the subjects at the time of treatment could have affected the findings. Although developmental age is a more accurate guide for predicting the adolescent growth spurt, a recent study 14 suggests that in the absence of hand-wrist radiographs, chronological age might be the next developmental index of choice. Furthermore, it has been shown that chronological age may be an adequate indicator of development age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the developmental stages of the subjects at the time of treatment could have affected the findings. Although developmental age is a more accurate guide for predicting the adolescent growth spurt, a recent study 14 suggests that in the absence of hand-wrist radiographs, chronological age might be the next developmental index of choice. Furthermore, it has been shown that chronological age may be an adequate indicator of development age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, events in the hand and wrist are indicators of the peak and the end of the pubertal growth spurt, but these events do not signal the onset of the pubertal growth spurt. 15 The cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method was introduced by Lamparski 16 for use in growth assessment, allowing skeletal age evaluation and eliminating the need for additional radiographic exposure since the vertebrae are already recorded in the lateral cephalogram taken as a pretreatment record. 1,5,14,17,18 However, the reproducibility of the CVM method has been questioned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, existem diversos autores que defendem que este método deve ser utilizado com muita precaução 18,40 ou mesmo que não deve ser utilizado para identificar os picos de crescimento da mandíbula uma vez que apesar de se conseguirem visualizar as diferenças na forma e tamanho das vértebras, não se conseguiram associar aos estádios de maturação correspondentes ao maior ou menor crescimento mandibular, em parte devido à grande subjetividade e ao seu carácter qualitativo em vez de quantitativo. [41][42][43][44][45] …”
Section: Discussionunclassified