2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The peculiar globular cluster Palomar 1 and persistence in the SDSS-APOGEE data base

Abstract: The SDSS-III APOGEE DR12 is a unique resource to search for stars beyond the tidal radii of star clusters. We have examined the APOGEE DR12 database for new candidates of the young star cluster Palomar 1, a system with previously reported tidal tails (Niederste-Ostholt et al. 2010). The APOGEE ASPCAP database includes spectra and stellar parameters for two known members of Pal 1 (Stars I and II), however these do not agree with the stellar parameters determined from optical spectra by Sakari et al. (2011). We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They allow the results obtained from a detailed analysis of a small calibration set to be transfered to an entire large data set of millions of spectra in a matter of minutes and can thus be a great aid in the development of the next generation of spectroscopy tools. They could also be of use in earlier stages of the data processing, for example, for homogenizing spectra taken with different instruments (e.g., the northern and southern APOGEE spectrographs) or for removing instrumental systematics such as persistence (e.g., Jahandar et al 2017). Such applications would be easy to…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They allow the results obtained from a detailed analysis of a small calibration set to be transfered to an entire large data set of millions of spectra in a matter of minutes and can thus be a great aid in the development of the next generation of spectroscopy tools. They could also be of use in earlier stages of the data processing, for example, for homogenizing spectra taken with different instruments (e.g., the northern and southern APOGEE spectrographs) or for removing instrumental systematics such as persistence (e.g., Jahandar et al 2017). Such applications would be easy to…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APOGEE team have also flagged specific stars and visits for a variety of other reasons. Stars from the DR13 dataset with either a STARFLAG or ASPCAPFLAG were removed from the dataset, which includes stars contaminated with persistence (see Jahandar et al 2017;Nidever et al 2015), stars that were flagged for having a bright neighbour, or having estimated parameters near the parameter grid edge of the synthetic models. Furthermore, stars with [Fe/H] < −3 were removed, or those with a radial velocity scatter, v scatter , greater than 1 km s −1 .…”
Section: Pre-processing Of the Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, efforts have been made towards incorporating non-LTE and 3D hydrodynamic effects in the model atmospheres (e.g., Amarsi 2015;Amarsi et al 2016;Kovalev et al 2019). Other methods have been proposed to isolate spectral regions -only using spectral regions where the astrophysics and instrumental effects are better understood (e.g., Jahandar et al 2017;Ting et al 2019). Furthermore, others have attempted to reduce this gap by augmenting the synthetic data through sampling and adding noise to make the spectra look more realistic (e.g., Bialek et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%