2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Peculiar Shrinkage Properties of Partial Least Squares Regression

Abstract: Partial least squares regression has been widely adopted within some areas as a useful alternative to ordinary least squares regression in the manner of other shrinkage methods such as principal components regression and ridge regression. In this paper we examine the nature of this shrinkage and demonstrate that partial least squares regression exhibits some undesirable properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stone and Brooks (1990) suggests that the methodology, in particular the choice of optimisation criterion, is arbitrary. Later Butler and Denham (2000) point out some rather non-intuitive shrinkage properties of the PLS procedure. However in applications, it is empirically competitive with other similar statistical procedures such as ridge regression and principal components regression, for instance see Frank and Friedman (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stone and Brooks (1990) suggests that the methodology, in particular the choice of optimisation criterion, is arbitrary. Later Butler and Denham (2000) point out some rather non-intuitive shrinkage properties of the PLS procedure. However in applications, it is empirically competitive with other similar statistical procedures such as ridge regression and principal components regression, for instance see Frank and Friedman (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that all shrinkage factors in OLS, PCR, and ridge regression are not greater than 1. However, this is not true for PLS regression, and some counterexamples are given in [146,176]. Furthermore, unlike OLS, PCR, and ridge regression, the shrinkage factors in PLS regression also depends on the response Y nonlinearly.…”
Section: ) 55mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shrinkage, due to the fact that PLS is an inverse calibration procedure, has been studied extensively by various authors [1,7,29,30]. An interesting property in the context of the assumed model (12) for the spectra is that with an infinite training set the regression vector (13) is optimal under a mean squared error of prediction criterion.…”
Section: Pls In the Presence Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%