2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep11460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The peculiarity of the metal-ceramic interface

Abstract: Important properties of materials are strongly influenced or controlled by the presence of solid interfaces, i.e. from the atomic arrangement in a region which is a few atomic spacing wide. Using the quantitative analysis of atom column positions enabled by CS-corrected transmission electron microscopy and theoretical calculations, atom behaviors at and adjacent to the interface was carefully explored. A regular variation of Cu interplanar spacing at a representative metal-ceramic interface was experimentally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the lattice mismatch between TiN and fcc Cu amounts to -17% [57,58], thus slightly exceeding the 15% rule. Still, epitaxial growth of Cu on TiN is not an unreasonable assumption, as it has been reported previously for Cu films deposited on MgO, where the lattice mismatch is comparable [59,60]. Pole figure measurements and TEM investigations discussed in the appended Paper I confirm that the TiN/Cu bilayers exhibit a cube-on-cube epitaxial relationship with the substrate, i.e.…”
Section: Epitaxial Growth Of Single-crystalline Filmssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In comparison, the lattice mismatch between TiN and fcc Cu amounts to -17% [57,58], thus slightly exceeding the 15% rule. Still, epitaxial growth of Cu on TiN is not an unreasonable assumption, as it has been reported previously for Cu films deposited on MgO, where the lattice mismatch is comparable [59,60]. Pole figure measurements and TEM investigations discussed in the appended Paper I confirm that the TiN/Cu bilayers exhibit a cube-on-cube epitaxial relationship with the substrate, i.e.…”
Section: Epitaxial Growth Of Single-crystalline Filmssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Experiments indicate that the special ORs with low-indexed planes between metal and oxide crystal exist in metal/oxide interface21. It has been suggested that the crystallographic ORs between the metal film and oxide substrate, especially the bonding between the first layer metal atoms and oxide substrate layer at the interface, determine the properties of metal films22232425. Experiments show that the ORs of interfaces are largely determined by lattice mismatch2026, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both contraction and crystal dislocations are generated where there is a break or mismatch in some property. Crystal dislocations repeat at its surface or the interface of a composite crystal (Liu et al., ; Sun et al., ; Zhang et al., ; Zhu, Li, Samanta, Leach, & Gall, ). In the intestine, the interface is a point of low coupling at a frequency step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal dislocations repeat at its surface or the interface of a composite crystal (Liu et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2015;Zhu, Li, Samanta, Leach, & Gall, 2008). In the intestine, the interface is a point of low coupling at a frequency step.…”
Section: Interval Waves As Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%