2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pediatric Heart Network Residual Lesion Score Study: Design and objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating the full treatment pathway from preoperative factors to postoperative events is attractive, but conceptually challenging. The recently proposed notion of "residual lesion score" from the Pediatric Heart Network 3 , based on previous work on technical performance scores 16 is one such attempt, and could offer even more insight into the mechanisms of unplanned reinterventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluating the full treatment pathway from preoperative factors to postoperative events is attractive, but conceptually challenging. The recently proposed notion of "residual lesion score" from the Pediatric Heart Network 3 , based on previous work on technical performance scores 16 is one such attempt, and could offer even more insight into the mechanisms of unplanned reinterventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Used judiciously, it could identify lapses in patient care, be it incomplete diagnosis, technical issues and residual defects or failed therapeutic plan. 3,4 On the other hand, uRE's are difficult to measure; we previously investigated early reoperations using UK National Congenital Heart Disease Audit (NCDHA) data, and found it impossible to retrospectively decide if a reintervention is "unplanned". 5 Nevertheless, the National Health Service in the UK has already adopted uRE as a metric of performance, 6 while a recent NCHDA report highlighted the limitations involved in collecting such data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because no published standards exist regarding the amount of time it takes to collect and manage research data, estimates of time were obtained through a series of semi-structured interviews with investigators, research coordinators, data managers from 18 academic institutions, programmers from four registry-based investigations, [15][16][17][18] and statisticians and project managers at HealthCore (formerly The New England Research Institutes), a contract research organisation with expertise in all aspects of trial implementation, including trial design, project management, data coordination and integration, research analytics, and quality assurance (www.healthcore.com). Amongst others, HealthCore coordinates trial activities for the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute-sponsored Pediatric Heart Network, which has led over 30 paediatric cardiovascular multi-centre investigations over the past 17 years (see Appendix 1 and Supplemental Figure 3).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, investigators work with collaborators at peer institutions, helping them to gather and share locally held data. This can be accomplished either via focused data queries at each site 15 or a more generic data harvest, with post hoc data manipulation. 25,26 We modelled each of these data acquisition strategies.…”
Section: Standard Clinical Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] The reliability of the modern CPB circuits has resulted in an important paradigm shift from speed to precision. [5][6][7][8][9] This has also permitted an expansion in the complexity of cases that can be undertaken given the safety of the CPB circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%