Residential and Inpatient Treatment of Children and Adolescents 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0927-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Peer Culture Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antisocial attitudes and psychological treatment Antisocial behaviour in adolescents and young adults is less likely to be altered in any enduring manner by behavioural techniques alone. A primary reason for this is that the behaviour in this sub-group often results from deeply held beliefs that support the use of aggression (e.g., Slaby & Guerra, 1988) and also the approval of aggressive behaviour by antisocial peers (Brendtro & Washmund, 1989). In institutional settings the picture is complicated further by the highly reinforcing nature of aggression in terms of establishing social status.…”
Section: Aggression After Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Antisocial attitudes and psychological treatment Antisocial behaviour in adolescents and young adults is less likely to be altered in any enduring manner by behavioural techniques alone. A primary reason for this is that the behaviour in this sub-group often results from deeply held beliefs that support the use of aggression (e.g., Slaby & Guerra, 1988) and also the approval of aggressive behaviour by antisocial peers (Brendtro & Washmund, 1989). In institutional settings the picture is complicated further by the highly reinforcing nature of aggression in terms of establishing social status.…”
Section: Aggression After Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because institutions calling themselves residential treatment centers varied enormously in size, populations served, and services, Petti (1980) observed, “There is no typical residential center and no general agreement as to what defines a residential center” (p. 209). In addition, the programs in these facilities were increasingly heterogeneous as behaviorist (Blasé, Fixen, Freeborn, & Jaeger, 1989; Browning & Stover, 1971; Cohen & Filipizak, 1971; Pizzat, 1973), group process (Brendtro & Wasmund, 1989; Vorrath & Brendtro, 1974), psychoeducational (Lewis & Lewis, 1989), and other models (Lyman, Prentice-Dunn, & Gabel, 1989; Wilson & Lyman, 1983) were introduced and little attention was given in the literature to general concepts that encompassed these diverse programs. At best, most residential programs would describe themselves as doing “milieu therapy” and “life-space interviews,” but such ideas were seldom defined or applied in rigorous ways (Whittaker, 1970).…”
Section: Residential Treatment: Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the psychodynamic milieu approach, a number of other types of treatment milieu for troubled youth were developed subsequent to the early psychoanalytically based programs (Zimmerman, 1990). Some of those developments have included the "positive peer culture" model (Brendtro & Wasmund, 1989), behavioral therapy (Blase, Fixsen, Freeborn, & Jaeger, 1989), and Hobbs' residential psychoeducational approach (Lewis & Lewis, 1989).…”
Section: On Transitions From Group Care: Homeward Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%