1980
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(80)90021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The penetration limit of thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis has been strongly indicated by crater residues on the Solar Max mission by Laurance and Brownlee (1986). However, it is shown that the choice of penetration formula referring those data to particulate mass (Pailer and Griin 1980) is at variance with other calibration data. The raw data of Laurance and Brownlee compare excellently with LDEF data; it is argued therefore that their data do not indicate a dominance of space debris below 10" 9 g. It could yet be found to be significant, and correspond to the excess flux seen on the East penetrations below approximately 25 ^im.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis has been strongly indicated by crater residues on the Solar Max mission by Laurance and Brownlee (1986). However, it is shown that the choice of penetration formula referring those data to particulate mass (Pailer and Griin 1980) is at variance with other calibration data. The raw data of Laurance and Brownlee compare excellently with LDEF data; it is argued therefore that their data do not indicate a dominance of space debris below 10" 9 g. It could yet be found to be significant, and correspond to the excess flux seen on the East penetrations below approximately 25 ^im.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ii) It is clear from the study of Carey et al (this volume) that, in the case of the perforation limit for particles with p = 1 g/cm-5 impacting aluminium foil, the Pailer and Griin (1980) equation gives the highest d/f or, in other terms, systematically favors low densities, iii) After correcting for the difference in sensitivity between the ecliptic and the south sensor, the excess of impacts reduces to ^ 1.4; a simple inspection of the experimental results of Pailer and Griin (1980) shows that this reduction of sensitivity may well be accounted for by particles having densities between 1.25 and 7.8 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: The Helios Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…the density of impacting grains and concluded that 30 % of interplanetary dust particles have densities below 1 g/cm 3 . This analysis calls however for several remarks, i) The relevant calibrations performed by Pailer and Griin (1980) cover only the following ranges: 1.25 -7.85 g/cm 3 for the projectile density, 10-13 -io-!0 g for the mass and 1.4 -13 km/sec for the velocity. The range of velocities is probably too low, but more important, no experimantal results are avaible for p < 1.25 g/cm 3 ; henceforth, the interpretation of the Helios data is based on extrapolations.…”
Section: The Helios Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only explanation of this observation is that the cover foil of the ecliptic sensor prevented a number of particles to be registered. An experimental investigation of the cover foil [13] showed that low density dust grains are not able to penetrate the foil. The relevant result [12] was the discovery that 2 types of particles orbit the sun: those of "normal" densities (between 3 and 8 g/cm3) on orbits with low eccentricities (g<0.6), and those of "low" densities ( rg 1 g/cm3) on orbits with high eccentricities (e>0.6).…”
Section: Properties Of Halley Dust Particlesmentioning
confidence: 98%