2011
DOI: 10.1080/14682745.2010.510837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perceived threat of hegemonism in Romania during the second détente

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first section of the study deals with Romania's vision of détente in the context of the CSCE and how the Romanian political elites envisaged the connection between the two processes. The second section explores Romania's reluctance to accept the bipolar vision in which the Soviet Union 5 Dragomir (2012): 120. approached the CSCE while the third section analyzes Romania's relations with Western Europe and its quest for common ground against the pressures of bipolarity. The period of reference is 1972-1975 covering the negotiation of the CSCE from its beginning to the signing of the Final Act in Helsinki.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section of the study deals with Romania's vision of détente in the context of the CSCE and how the Romanian political elites envisaged the connection between the two processes. The second section explores Romania's reluctance to accept the bipolar vision in which the Soviet Union 5 Dragomir (2012): 120. approached the CSCE while the third section analyzes Romania's relations with Western Europe and its quest for common ground against the pressures of bipolarity. The period of reference is 1972-1975 covering the negotiation of the CSCE from its beginning to the signing of the Final Act in Helsinki.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Bucharest had since 1964 tended to portray itself as a maverick member of the Warsaw Pact, willing to serve as a bridge between the two camps. 29 Against this backdrop, Romania was the most persistent and staunchest advocate of Balkan co-operation -whether bilateral or multilateral. In private talks with Karamanlis, Romanian leader Nicolae Ceausescu underlined the importance of the creation of a Balkan body targeted against aggression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%