1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00706650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Perception of obesity by normal-weight versus obese school-age children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect of the findings is consistent with the results of previous studies, which have likewise found that the gender of the target and participant has no effect on negative stereotyping in children (Hill & Silver, 1995;Stager & Burke, 1982), and nor does the child's age (Stager & Burke, 1982;Tiggemann & Wilson-Barrett, 1998). Hill and Silver and Counts et al (1986) have also found that the weight of the child has little impact on children's judgments of overweight and thin figures. This confirms that overweight children do not have less negative attitudes toward obese targets than do average-weight children and, hence, are not positively biased toward their own group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This aspect of the findings is consistent with the results of previous studies, which have likewise found that the gender of the target and participant has no effect on negative stereotyping in children (Hill & Silver, 1995;Stager & Burke, 1982), and nor does the child's age (Stager & Burke, 1982;Tiggemann & Wilson-Barrett, 1998). Hill and Silver and Counts et al (1986) have also found that the weight of the child has little impact on children's judgments of overweight and thin figures. This confirms that overweight children do not have less negative attitudes toward obese targets than do average-weight children and, hence, are not positively biased toward their own group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By using adjective checklist methods with line-drawing silhouettes, 7-12 year olds described overweight figures as more lazy, less popular, less happy, and less attractive (Tiggemann & Wilson-Barrett, 1998); 6 -11 year olds ascribed negative characteristics to overweight targets such as lazy, sloppy, dirty, cheats, lies, argues, mean, and stupid (Staffieri, 1967(Staffieri, , 1972; and 7-9 year olds assigned more negative ratings (such as poorer social functioning and academic success) to overweight targets than to thinner targets (Hill & Silver, 1995;Kraig & Keel, 2001). By using photographs of obese and average-weight peers who were described as potential partners to play a game with, students in Grades 3-5 perceived the obese target to be a worse game partner and a poorer leader, and the obese target was ascribed fewer positive attributes than was the average-weight target (Counts et al, 1986). A variation of the adjective checklist method with videos of child actors wearing a fat suit or no suit also demonstrated that children in Grades 3-6 assigned more negative characteristics to the obese target (Bell & Morgan, 2000).…”
Section: Peersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most research that has considered weight status of the perceiver has found that it does not influence acceptance of others who are overweight [e.e., 48,49]. Further, children who are overweight may hold the same negative perceptions of overweight peers as children who are of average weight [50]. This underscores the complex nature of psychosocial development among youth who are overweight.…”
Section: Psychosocial Consequences Complications and Risk Factors Amentioning
confidence: 97%