1996
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(96)00027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perception of risk in the workplace: A test of routine activity theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, Miethe and Meier (1990), Miethe and McDowall (1993), Madriz (1996) and Kanan and Pruitt (2002) have argued that the routine activity theory can be extended to explain people's perceptions of crime and vulnerability to crime. For example, Zhang et al (2007) used the routine activity theory to explain variation in the risk of household burglary in Tianjin in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, Miethe and Meier (1990), Miethe and McDowall (1993), Madriz (1996) and Kanan and Pruitt (2002) have argued that the routine activity theory can be extended to explain people's perceptions of crime and vulnerability to crime. For example, Zhang et al (2007) used the routine activity theory to explain variation in the risk of household burglary in Tianjin in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As interest in this micro-level theory grew, criminologists began to consider routine activity theory as a victimization theory because it focuses on the daily routines and lifestyles of victims (Birkbeck & LaFree, 1993;Brown, Esbensen, & Geis, 2015;Cohen, Kluegel, & Land, 1981;Hindelang, Gottfredson, & Garofalo, 1978;Madriz, 1996;Meier & Miethe, 1993). It has only been recently that criminologists have included offenders and their lifestyles, which may give them increased odds of committing a crime (Brown, Esbensen, & Geis, 2015).…”
Section: Chapter III Routine Activities Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the closer the victim and the offender are in distance, the higher the probability that a crime may occur (De Coster, Estes, & Mueller, 1999;Landau & Bendalak, 2008;Lynch, 1987;Madriz, 1996;Miethe & Meier, 1990;Mustaine & Tewksbury, 1999;Wittebrood & Nieuwbeerta, 2000;Wooldredge, Cullen, & Latessa, 1992). Further, the proximity of the target to high crime areas increases to opportunity for crime to occur (Meier & Miethe, 1993).…”
Section: Chapter III Routine Activities Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations