The Perceptions of Reception Staff in General Practice About the Factors Influencing Specific Medication Errors

Abstract

The pilot study presented here is part of a larger project identifying and investigating the factors influencing errors in prescribing and dispensing drugs known to be of high risk: prednisolone, warfarin, lisinopril, morphine, carbamazepine, digoxin and methotrexate. This work has highlighted the central role that general practice (GP) receptionists have in the prescribing process and the importance of their perspectives in understanding how medication errors occur in general practice. Receptionists within Greater Glasgow were purposively sampled from a survey of personal experience of errors involving the drugs of interest. Five one-to-one in-depth interviews and one group interview with receptionists were conducted, exploring the perceptions of receptionists about the factors that influence errors. Four themes emerged from the interviews, related to receptionists' perceptions of factors influencing errors: trust in the GP to check prescriptions; the receptionists' role of communicating with patients; workload; and the hospital-surgery link. This research illustrates the important contribution that receptionists can make to understanding how errors occur in general practice. Receptionists have responsibilities for the continuation of care by communicating with patients, doctors and external care providers and they perceive that problems in communication with these parties can develop into medicine-related errors. These findings may inform educational outcomes for receptionists including involvement in the practice's protected learning time and interpersonal skills development, as well as improved communication skills in other health professionals.

Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice

“…Examples include capturing perceptions, feelings and experiences related to: work roles and in-service training14–16; influencing access and continuity of care17; risks and effects of violence, and impacts on psychological well-being and work performance and satisfaction18–20; improving communication and providing support to enhance clinical care quality21 and perceptions of how medication errors can occur 22…”

Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study

“…24 A small interview study documented receptionists' perceptions about causes of medication error. 25 Electronic records are sometimes assumed to make prescribing safer by reducing human errors such as illegibility, inaccurate transcription, omissions, and use of dangerous abbreviations and arcane Latin. 8 26-28 The assumption is that by increasing the automation of generating, checking, authorising, and issuing repeat prescriptions, safety will be improved.…”

Protocol for using mixed methods and process improvement methodologies to explore primary care receptionist work

“…Repeat prescribing has been recognised as a core element of the receptionist role,11 57 one where they make extensive use of tacit knowledge and situated judgements to bridge the gap between the formal organisational routine and the actual routine as it plays out in practice 58. They make important hidden contributions to quality and safety in repeat prescribing and there is evidence they judge themselves accountable to patients for those contributions 53.…”