2007
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2007.896955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Perceptual and Attentive Impact of Delay and Jitter in Multimedia Delivery

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper we present the results of a study that examines the user's perception-understood as both information assimilation and subjective satisfaction-of multimedia quality, when impacted by varying network-level parameters (delay and jitter). In addition, we integrate eye-tracking assessment to provide a more complete understanding of user perception of multimedia quality. Results show that delay and jitter significantly affect user satisfaction; variation in video eye path when either no single… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant effort has also been applied to designing objective algorithms that are capable of predicting visual quality with high correlation against subjective perception [11]- [14]. Previous subjective studies on VQA have been performed on large format displays such as CRT/LCD monitors, while typically distorted videos have included compressed videos (H.264/MPEG), videos transmitted over wireless/IP channels [5], [6] and jittered and delayed videos [15], [16]. While video quality on mobile devices has not been extensively researched, there have been a few studies on the quality assessment of videos on mobile devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant effort has also been applied to designing objective algorithms that are capable of predicting visual quality with high correlation against subjective perception [11]- [14]. Previous subjective studies on VQA have been performed on large format displays such as CRT/LCD monitors, while typically distorted videos have included compressed videos (H.264/MPEG), videos transmitted over wireless/IP channels [5], [6] and jittered and delayed videos [15], [16]. While video quality on mobile devices has not been extensively researched, there have been a few studies on the quality assessment of videos on mobile devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the network level, objective Quality of Service (QoS) parameters such as packet loss, bandwidth, delay and jitter can be measured in order to detect possible network failures which could lead to a degradation of the received video signal [11], [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty is compounded when Quality-of-Service (QoS) constraints are added to the scheduling problem. It is has been shown that effective IPTV delivery requires low jitter [28][29][30]. The selection of a set of N cells to transfer per time-slot in an IQ switch is equivalent to finding a matching in a bipartite graph.…”
Section: Luxembourg the Netherlands Finland Andorra Sweden And Smentioning
confidence: 99%