1923
DOI: 10.1021/ja01655a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE PERCHLORATES OF THE ALKALI AND ALKALINE EARTH METALS AND AMMONIUM. THEIR SOLUBILITY IN WATER AND OTHER SOLVENTS1

Abstract: The work done in connection with this paper deals with the perchlorates of barium, strontium, calcium, magnesium, lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium and ammonium. Solubilities of the anhydrous perchlorates at 25°were determined in water and in anhydrous methyl, ethyl, w-propyl, isoand n-butyl alcohols, ether, acetone and ethyl acetate. The solubility of lithium perchlorate trihydrate was also determined in the above solvents. In the study of these perchlorates a careful search was made for .new hydra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that between the change in the solubility of LP and MP in nine solvents24, 25 a mutual proportionality has not been observed ( R = −0.45). The solubility of LP in diethyl ether at 25 °C corresponds to a maximum value of 6.06 M, whereas the solubility of MP in diethyl ether amounts only to (6–9) × 10 −3 M 24, 25. There is also a considerable difference concerning the solvent influence on the enthalpy of solution of MP and LP ( R = 0.79).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It should be noted that between the change in the solubility of LP and MP in nine solvents24, 25 a mutual proportionality has not been observed ( R = −0.45). The solubility of LP in diethyl ether at 25 °C corresponds to a maximum value of 6.06 M, whereas the solubility of MP in diethyl ether amounts only to (6–9) × 10 −3 M 24, 25. There is also a considerable difference concerning the solvent influence on the enthalpy of solution of MP and LP ( R = 0.79).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar results are observed for azulene and 2 in solutions of lithium perchlorate‐diethyl ether, hereafter LPDE, as recorded in Table III. Strictly anhydrous lithium perchlorate is extremely soluble in dry diethyl ether, with solutions up to 6.06 M possible 21, 22, 49–57. Below 4.25 M LPDE, these solutions are composed of increasing amounts of Li(OEt 2 ) +2 ClO 4 ions, while at 4.25 M Li(OEt 2 ) +2 ClO 4 exists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 4.25 M and 6.06 M LPDE, the concentration of Li(OEt 2 ) +2 ClO 4 decreases and that of Li(OEt 2 ) + ClO 4 increases. The limit of solubility, 6.06 M, corresponds to the ionic composition Li(OEt 2 ) + ClO 4 with 5 M LPDE solutions having been described as “more polar than water” 22, 49, 50, 58. As in neat solvents, the low‐energy absorbance band of 1 displays a lack of solvatochromism, undergoing a mere 1 nm change in λ max from pure ether to a 5 M LPDE solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Macherey-Nagel NucleoTraP PCR Clean-up Kit performed significantly worse than the other three kits which we evaluated. This could have been due to incompatibility of residual 2-butanol left over following phase separation with the binding buffer; the binding buffer of the NucleoTraP kit contains sodium perchlorate, which can be insoluble in butanol depending on the concentration [12]. Thus, to avoid similar issues, kits which contain sodium perchlorate in the extraction buffers may want to be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%