2008
DOI: 10.2337/db08-0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Perfect Storm” for Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract: It is often stated that type 1 diabetes results from a complex interplay between varying degrees of genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. While agreeing with this principal, our desire is that this Perspectives article will highlight another complex interplay potentially associated with this disease involving facets related to the gut, one where individual factors that, upon their interaction with each another, form a "perfect storm" critical to the development of type 1 diabetes. This trio of fact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
359
2
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
359
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There is mounting evidence suggesting that intrinsic or induced intestinal barrier defects skew the intestinal immune environment or the commensal microbiota to promote type 1 diabetes [14]. For example, type 1 diabetes Per cent of islets with no insulitis (score 0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is mounting evidence suggesting that intrinsic or induced intestinal barrier defects skew the intestinal immune environment or the commensal microbiota to promote type 1 diabetes [14]. For example, type 1 diabetes Per cent of islets with no insulitis (score 0).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impaired intestinal barrier function has also been detected in rodent models of type 1 diabetes [3][4][5][6][7] and in type 1 diabetes patients and their relatives [8][9][10][11][12]. Changes in the intestine, induced by dietary or enteric antigens, have been proposed as causative factors in the course of type 1 diabetes [13,14]; however, the role of the gut and enteric microbes in type 1 diabetes remains unclear. We thus propose that impaired intestinal barrier function in diabetes-prone individuals may allow commensal or pathogenic enteric bacterial antigens to elicit inflammatory signals that promote type 1 diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 Based on available experimental and clinical results, it has been proposed that the pathogenesis of T1D is closely linked to events that take place in the intestinal mucosa, where complex interplay between the intestinal microbiota, gut permeability and mucosal immunity determines autoimmune damage to pancreatic beta cells. 34 In several associations, this has also been demonstrated in CD and other autoimmune diseases. 4,35 Here, we aimed to assess whether differences in intestinal permeability, characterized by TJP1 mRNA expression, and intestinal regulatory T cells, measured by Foxp3 mRNA expression, as well as different serum antibodies levels exist between CD patients with and without accompanying T1D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Diabetes development is commonly described to result from an interplay between genetic and environmental factors, and several susceptibility genes and environmental or lifestyle factors are known to contribute to both type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) 1, 2. In T1D, genetic mutations of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) are the most common variants,3 while also virus infections have been implicated in T1D development 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In T1D, genetic mutations of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) are the most common variants,3 while also virus infections have been implicated in T1D development 3. The application of genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) has identified over 50 gene variants associated with T2D 2, 4. The high number of genetic alleles with low odds ratios for disease predictability in T2D confirms that genetic and environmental factors interlink in the development of the disease 5, 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%