2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ares.2016.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Perfect Storm: The Privacy Paradox and the Internet-of-Things

Abstract: Privacy is a concept found throughout human history and opinion polls suggest that the public value this principle. However, while many individuals claim to care about privacy, they are often perceived to express behaviour to the contrary. This phenomenon is known as the Privacy Paradox and its existence has been validated through numerous psychological, economic and computer science studies. Several contributory factors have been suggested including user interface design, risk salience, social norms and defau… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1/3 of our respondents displayed an opinion-action disparity, suggesting the presence of the Paradox. While some non-IoT owners acted in this manner, the disparity was significantly more prevalent in IoT users [14]. We hypothesise this to be due to reduced awareness, with this rationale predominantly given by participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1/3 of our respondents displayed an opinion-action disparity, suggesting the presence of the Paradox. While some non-IoT owners acted in this manner, the disparity was significantly more prevalent in IoT users [14]. We hypothesise this to be due to reduced awareness, with this rationale predominantly given by participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This inconsistency between users' intention to protect private information and their actual behaviors not to do so refer to a phenomenon called the privacy paradox (Norberg, Horne, & Horne, ). Researchers even proposed that this phenomenon would aggravate due to the new features of the IoT technologies (e.g., intelligent wearables), such as constrained user interfaces, ubiquitous device presence, and vast data collection (Williams, Nurse, & Creese, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers even proposed that this phenomenon would aggravate due to the new features of the IoT technologies (e.g., intelligent wearables), such as constrained user interfaces, ubiquitous device presence, and vast data collection (Williams, Nurse, & Creese, 2016).…”
Section: Privacy Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet-of-Things (IoT) pervades daily life, blurring the physical and virtual worlds. This entanglement leads to online risks becoming increasingly intangible, contributing to further cyber-threats [9]. Social norms evolve sufficiently that the IoT is considered 'normal' and those who shun these novel technologies are viewed as antiquated.…”
Section: B Constructed Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%