The Perfect Wellbore!

Mason, Colin; Chen, David

doi:10.2523/95279-ms

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This observation is consistent with prior experience elsewhere where a relationship between magnitude of friction factor value and wellbore quality has been noted 12,13 . This suggests that improvements to wellbore instability through the use of higher mud weights can be measured by examining friction factor values.…”

Section: Torque and Drag (Tandd) Analysessupporting

confidence: 91%

Supersize Hole Creates Drilling Opportunity

Mason¹,

Wenande²,

Chen³

2007

Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional well designs for high angle and extended-reach wells often mandate long 12¼" hole sections through the overburden. Effective hole cleaning and wellbore instability management are key technical challenges commonly associated with delivery of this section. However, despite the use of rotary steerable systems, which help promote good hole cleaning and minimise open hole exposure times, problematical trips out of hole are commonplace. The symptoms of tight hole are often associated with significant cuttings bed accumulations, use of packed assemblies or creep arising from swelling formations.In an attempt to improve overall drilling performance, a supersize hole strategy has been implemented to intentionally drill an enlarged hole through the overburden. At face value, this tactic seems to have as many disadvantages as advantages . However, practical experience of simultaneously drilling and underreaming 12¼ "×13½" hole sections over a number of wells has resulted in overall efficiency improvements.The primary benefits associated with drilling an enlarged hole are ease of tripping-out drilling assemblies and more straightforward casing runs. Other advantages relate to lower downhole pressures or equivalent circulation density (ECD), decreased swab and surge pressures , and less string contact area. Disadvantages relate to increased hole cleaning requirements, additional tool failures as a result of higher vibration and a decreased rate of penetration (ROP).The paper discuss es various aspects of drilling and underreaming and contrasts results between enlarged and conventional hole sizes. Results from drilling both 12¼" and 12¼"×13½" hole sections in the Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli (ACG) fields in the Caspian Sea are reported. ROP (Rate of Penetration) and a new metric TTSW ( Time To Secure Wellbore) are used to provide meaningful comparisons.

show abstract

Section: Torque and Drag (Tandd) Analysessupporting

confidence: 91%

Supersize Hole Creates Drilling Opportunity

Mason¹,

Wenande²,

Chen³

2007

Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The benefits of a quality wellbore have previously been documented [5]. Beyond this a methodology has been proposed with the aim of quantifying wellbore quality based on a scorecard method [6].…”

Section: -1 Tortuosity and Hole Spirallingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this respect, one of the drivers for success will be to understand the relationship between a drilled wellbore and its companion casing run. Some aspects of this topic have previously been investigated, where various guidelines and methodologies have been developed [4], [5], and [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Drilling and Casing Running Enigma

Mason

Chen

2006

Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractRunning casing in high angle and extended-reach wells is often recognized as one of the most demanding of all well construction operations. In such wells, frictional drag and unexpected downhole mechanical resistance can exceed available surface slack-off weight. The ability to reliably predict casing running performance will significantly help to reduce costs in challenging wells. Interestingly, a complex and often subtle relationship exists between a drilled wellbore and the subsequent casing run. This relationship is sometimes predictable and at other times surprisingly different. A key to resolving this enigma lies in understanding the many factors, such as wellbore quality, that influence the outcome of casing running operations. The paper reviews a number of topics that are considered key to understanding the relationship between drilling and casing running. Various results are illustrated using case studies from field operations.

show abstract

The Drilling and Casing Running Enigma

Mason

Chen

2006

SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Running casing in high angle and extended-reach wells is often recognized as one of the most demanding of all well construction operations. In such wells, frictional drag and unexpected downhole mechanical resistance can exceed available surface slack-off weight. The ability to reliably predict casing running performance will significantly help to reduce costs in challenging wells. Interestingly, a complex and often subtle relationship exists between a drilled wellbore and the subsequent casing run. This relationship is sometimes predictable and at other times surprisingly different. A key to resolving this enigma lies in understanding the many factors, such as wellbore quality, that influence the outcome of casing running operations. The paper reviews a number of topics that are considered key to understanding the relationship between drilling and casing running. Various results are illustrated using case studies from field operations. Introduction The requirement to access hydrocarbon reserves in environments that require ultra-extended reach wells will continue to increase. Typical scenarios involve accessing offshore reserves from nearby shore locations or satellite fields considered just out of reach of existing platform structures. Step-out records for extended-reach wells currently exceed 10 km. Such noteworthy achievements are very likely to be surpassed by some considerable margin during the next 5 to 10 years. Recent examples of ultra-reach wells include several 10 km wells drilled off Sakhalin Island in Russia [1], 10 km record wells at the Wytch Farm oil field development in Southern England [2] and also at the Austral field off Tierra del Fuego in Argentina [3]. In the future, extended-reach developments will drive the need for robust well designs and highly reliable technology to ensure cost effectiveness. A particular feature of such well designs will be the requirement to drill and case very long hole sections. In this respect, one of the drivers for success will be to understand the relationship between a drilled wellbore and its companion casing run. Some aspects of this topic have previously been investigated, where various guidelines and methodologies have been developed [4], [5], and [6]. The disparity between a drilled wellbore considered fit-for-purpose and a subsequent casing running failure is the main theme of this paper. This so called enigma is explored by dividing the paper into a number of focus areas. These broadly encompass the topics entitled wellbore quality, hole geometry and torque and drag (T&D) modelling. Each of these is assessed for evidence that may help with understanding factors that contribute to the enigma. What is the Enigma? During planning of an extended-reach or other challenging well type, drilling and casing running operations are usually reviewed using a wide ranging set of well design assumptions. These may be based on offset well experience or might be based on industry experience using publications such as SPE papers. The validity of these assumptions should always be closely examined, as they often play a fundamental role in determining the outcome of a drilling or casing running operation. The drilling and casing running enigma arises from time to time in varying circumstances. This is sometimes as a result of using invalid assumptions, sometimes as a result of poor knowledge transfer and occasionally as an event that has not been observed before. The enigma considered here is that a drilled wellbore is considered fit-for-purpose for running casing. However for some apparently unknown reason, casing fails to get to depth. Usually casing running problems are attributed to a geometrical anomaly such as a fault or ledge, wellbore instability, poorly cleaned hole, time dependent effects or mechanical equipment failure such as centralizers.

show abstract

The Perfect Wellbore!

Cited by 12 publications

References 19 publications

Supersize Hole Creates Drilling Opportunity

Supersize Hole Creates Drilling Opportunity

The Drilling and Casing Running Enigma

The Drilling and Casing Running Enigma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About