2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perforating branches of the P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3 we have presented the distance measured from the basilar artery bifurcation to the first observed perforating branch. Kaya et al [8] confirms that in their study TPAs was the most proximal branch among all perforators. According to Marinkovic et al [13,14] TPAs can originate from P2 segment, which took place in 3.3% of all cases in their study, and from the posterior communicating artery in 6.6% of all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In Table 3 we have presented the distance measured from the basilar artery bifurcation to the first observed perforating branch. Kaya et al [8] confirms that in their study TPAs was the most proximal branch among all perforators. According to Marinkovic et al [13,14] TPAs can originate from P2 segment, which took place in 3.3% of all cases in their study, and from the posterior communicating artery in 6.6% of all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Most studies did not encounter morphometric anomalies of P1 ( Table 1 ). Kaya (2010) found different anatomical variants of the posterior circulation in 10.7% specimens, but not the association of AOP with FPCA [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P3 segment continues from the P2 segment to the calcarine fissure. The anterior calcarine sulcus marks the beginning of the P4 segment and continues to the cortical surface where this segment terminates [ 3 , 4 ]. Caruso et al [ 3 ] reported that the variations in the P1 segment are rare and occur in only 3% of cases [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%