2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance and dispersing mechanism of anionic dispersants in slurries prepared by upgraded coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High‐ash content could decrease calorific value, 43 and increase specific coal consumption and specific oxygen consumption, 44 implying a new perspective on the understanding of the effect of acid leaching on the slurryability of DCLR. The effective maximum solid loadings (ash‐free basis) of the slurries prepared with DEM‐1 and DEM‐2 are 65.8% and 64.8%, respectively, which are higher than that of the DCLRWS (64.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐ash content could decrease calorific value, 43 and increase specific coal consumption and specific oxygen consumption, 44 implying a new perspective on the understanding of the effect of acid leaching on the slurryability of DCLR. The effective maximum solid loadings (ash‐free basis) of the slurries prepared with DEM‐1 and DEM‐2 are 65.8% and 64.8%, respectively, which are higher than that of the DCLRWS (64.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between apparent viscosity and solid content of CWS at a shear rate of 100 s –1 is depicted in Figure . Meanwhile, the solid loading of CWS with an apparent viscosity of (1000 ± 100) mPa s was regarded as the maximum slurry concentration. , As illustrated in Figure , the apparent viscosity increased significantly as coal was added for all slurries. It could be attributed to increased frequency for particle collisions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the poor slurryability of low-rank coal, significant effort has been made to improve the adsorption performance of PC, which has provided many valuable results for other researchers. 11,[14][15][16][17] The common method is to speculate the adsorption behavior of dispersant by measuring its adsorption capacity, adsorption thickness, contact angle, and zeta potential. 11,15 The combination of the water wettability on the coal surface and the zeta potential of coal particles was employed by Kakui et al to study the adsorption behavior of the functional groups in polymer dispersants as well as the aromatic groups and sodium sulfonate group in the sodium aromatic sulfonate structure on the coal surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[14][15][16][17] The common method is to speculate the adsorption behavior of dispersant by measuring its adsorption capacity, adsorption thickness, contact angle, and zeta potential. 11,15 The combination of the water wettability on the coal surface and the zeta potential of coal particles was employed by Kakui et al to study the adsorption behavior of the functional groups in polymer dispersants as well as the aromatic groups and sodium sulfonate group in the sodium aromatic sulfonate structure on the coal surface. They provided a schematic illustration to describe the hydrophobic interaction between the aromatic groups in the sodium aromatic sulfonate structure and the multi-ring portion of the carbonaceous particles on the coal surface as well as the ion bonding force between the sodium sulfonate group in the sodium aromatic sulfonate structure and the positively charged position on the coal surface in a CWS with pH 7-8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation