2018 Electric Electronics, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineerings' Meeting (EBBT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ebbt.2018.8391430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance evaluation of the Cat and Particle Swarm Optimization Techniques in the image enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that BFA yielded better performance metrics than GA. CSO, inspired by the behaviors of tracing and seeking mode of the cats, was first presented by Chu et al [23]. Çam et al [24] reported that CSO is faster than PSO in IE but lags in terms of Structural Similarity Index (SSIM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that BFA yielded better performance metrics than GA. CSO, inspired by the behaviors of tracing and seeking mode of the cats, was first presented by Chu et al [23]. Çam et al [24] reported that CSO is faster than PSO in IE but lags in terms of Structural Similarity Index (SSIM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seeking mode, parameters represent the state of a cat visually scanning its environment to decide on its next destination. In tracing mode, parameters depict a cat as it tracks a target and moves closer to it [23,24,38,39]. In the context of HS, it can adaptively select the appropriate mode to locate the optimal stretching parameters.…”
Section: Cat Swarm Optimization (Cso)mentioning
confidence: 99%