… since you know as well as we do that right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.
-Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War
Rhetoric, Agency, and the Workings of PowerAs social, cultural, and political subjects, we are all constituted in power. Power is not something external to the subject, but rather a context and an idiom of subjectivity. It is creative and generative, as Foucault (1977) would argue, and also relational insofar as it is manifested in relationships (Etzioni 1993;Kritzman 1988;Wolf 1999). It has long been argued that resistance itself, as Foucault ([1976] 1990: 95) put it, "is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power" (see also Abu-Lughod 1990;Mitchell 1990; Reed-Danahay 1993;Williams 2008). In a recent article on autonomy and the French alter-globalization movement, which also builds on Donald Moore's (1998) argument, Williams (2008: 80-81) claims that "[r]esistance … emerges not from an originary site but from oppositional practices, which … are always relational and dynamic."The present collection of articles focuses on such relational and dynamic (mostly discursive) practices, seeking to examine the connections between power, identity, history, and agency. Imbued with historicity and inspired by local narrative, the contributions to this special issue do not conflate poweras a concept and context-with Western powers as political formations. They rather attempt to deconstruct relations of power; to examine the consequences of the excess of power inherent in modern political processes; and to recover agency by taking local commentary seriously.
| Elisabeth Kirtsoglou