IEEE Proceedings of the SOUTHEASTCON '91
DOI: 10.1109/secon.1991.147917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of dually polarized M-QAM and L-QPRS systems with crosstalk and differential phase shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 illustrates the impact of in-band crosstalk on higher-order modulation formats; (a) and (b) show a 16-QAM signal constellation (open circles) onto which another 16-QAM constellation (filled circles) with the same phase (a) or with a 45º-rotation relative to the signal (b) is added as an interferer. Since the minimum distance between symbols is most strongly affected by the rotated interferer, we expect the strongest impact of crosstalk for that case [7]. Figure 1(c) shows numerical simulations of the crosstalk penalty in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per symbol required to achieve a bit-error ratio (BER) of 10 -3 for ideal, square 4-, 16-, 64-, and 256-QAM constellations, based on Monte Carlo simulations of 2 17 symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the impact of in-band crosstalk on higher-order modulation formats; (a) and (b) show a 16-QAM signal constellation (open circles) onto which another 16-QAM constellation (filled circles) with the same phase (a) or with a 45º-rotation relative to the signal (b) is added as an interferer. Since the minimum distance between symbols is most strongly affected by the rotated interferer, we expect the strongest impact of crosstalk for that case [7]. Figure 1(c) shows numerical simulations of the crosstalk penalty in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per symbol required to achieve a bit-error ratio (BER) of 10 -3 for ideal, square 4-, 16-, 64-, and 256-QAM constellations, based on Monte Carlo simulations of 2 17 symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%