After finishing this book, an attentive reader might turn back to the front cover and utter the title as an admonishment. With some disgust, they might point to the state-the absolute state -of UK health policy. That is not to say that this book is polemic; it does not offer a sensationalist account of the death of the NHS at the hands of the UK health policy. Rather, the collection of chapters offers scholarly, detailed analysis, drawing on a wide range of empirical studies. It is this clarity and depth of analysis that leaves little room for any celebratory spin to the 75th anniversary of the founding of the NHS that this book commemorates. Although there are no clichéd medical analogies apparent in this book, it is hard to banish imagery of the NHS in 2023 as a sick patient or, perhaps more accurately, an unhealthy population ravaged by neglect and scarcity.The NHS at 75 offers an analytical framework with four axes: governance (across hierarchies, markets and networks); the public/private axis (of provision and funding including the role of marketisation); degrees of centralisation and decentralisation; and the dynamics between professionals and the state (with a particular focus on the medical profession). The analytic framework provides coherence to the wide-ranging dissection, chapter by chapter, of governance, funding, management, quality, general practice, health inequalities, involvement of patients and the public and the relationship with social care. There are some areas where the framing of these axes constrains the analysis to within the purely organisational domain. Some debates, such as those about the role of the NHS in addressing health inequalities and the differentiation of responsibilities between family and state in the context of social care, could potentially benefit from a broader social and cultural interpretation of the public and private axis. However, within the framing chosen, the book achieves its purpose of analysing and evaluating the state of the NHS and UK health policy and efficiently banishes some myths along the way-such as the idea that the NHS is over-managed.In addition to the four analytical axes that provide the overall structure for the book, there are some other important sociological framings. The chapter on quality and the NHS not only provides an understanding of what quality is but how quality is done, with a historical and sociological account of how the construct of quality has been produced and reproduced. Similarly, the chapter on general practice goes beyond considering the success, or otherwise, of