2023
DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of Primary Healthcare in China: The Need for a Systematic Design for Improvement Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China"

Abstract: In the paper "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China," Rasooly and colleagues provide an in-depth analysis of the ways in which Shanghai manages the quality and performance of the primary healthcare (PHC). The present commentary extends the analytical perspective offered in this paper from the city of Shanghai to the entire Chinese Mainland. In so doing, it points out certain systemic shortcomings in the capabilities of family doctors, the unreasonable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In addition, some countries such as Sweden have emphasized the perspective of individuals living with diabetes and have developed a set of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be incorporated into the country’s National Diabetes Register. 12 Implementing PROMs in China’s context aligns with Jian et al commentary, 8 which called for “using indicators that are more relevant to residents’ health.”…”
Section: The Why What Who and How Of Quality Measurementmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…11 In addition, some countries such as Sweden have emphasized the perspective of individuals living with diabetes and have developed a set of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be incorporated into the country’s National Diabetes Register. 12 Implementing PROMs in China’s context aligns with Jian et al commentary, 8 which called for “using indicators that are more relevant to residents’ health.”…”
Section: The Why What Who and How Of Quality Measurementmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The mean score of 61.01 suggests room for improvement, indicating the need for targeted capacity building and resource allocation. The diversity in scores across districts, classes, and urban/rural areas underscores the importance of tailored interventions to address speci c challenges in healthcare service delivery [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%