2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00081-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of professional market timers: daily evidence from executed strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5. Following Chance and Hemler's (2001) argument that higher frequency data yield more significant results than lower frequency data, but recognising that the frequency of tactical asset allocation is constrained by expense, time and information requirements, the study employs monthly data to test the IAPE metric. See also Tezel and McManus (2001: 175 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Following Chance and Hemler's (2001) argument that higher frequency data yield more significant results than lower frequency data, but recognising that the frequency of tactical asset allocation is constrained by expense, time and information requirements, the study employs monthly data to test the IAPE metric. See also Tezel and McManus (2001: 175 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the consensus of studies that test fund returns for evidence of timing ability over daily horizons appears favorable (Busse, 1999;Bollen and Busse, 2001;Chance and Hemler, 2001;Fleming, Kirby, and Ostdiek, 2001). Such ability, however, likely has little to do with slower-moving macroeconomic information shown to be useful for predicting returns at a much longer horizon.…”
Section: Studies That Do Support Successful Market Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then estimate the weight recursively using an expanding sample. Chance and Hemler [2001] suggest that we can test market-timing abilities using Spearman's rank correlation between the weight of equities, . We consider the two specifications for γ ; however, as expected, Exhibit 1 shows that the market-timing ability test does not depend on γ .…”
Section: Market-timing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%