2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)30804-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of prognostic models as predictors of mortality in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, there were 153 patients, in which the number of male patients was double that of female patients (66.7%; 33.3%). This finding is consistent with the previous studies in Vietnam [19,20] and others worldwide [21][22][23][24]. Thus, the male predominance is apparent, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: General Patient Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, there were 153 patients, in which the number of male patients was double that of female patients (66.7%; 33.3%). This finding is consistent with the previous studies in Vietnam [19,20] and others worldwide [21][22][23][24]. Thus, the male predominance is apparent, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: General Patient Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, the distribution of Child-Pugh scores was Child A (9.8%), Child B (44.4%), and Child C (45.8%.) Meanwhile, these proportions in Charif's study were Child A (19.2%), Child B (54.6%), and Child C (26.1%) [30] and, in Fayad's study, were Child A (12.2%), Child B (35.8%), and Child C (52%) [24]. This shows a marked difference in the distribution across Child classifications, especially for Child B and C. The mean values of MELD and MELDNa scores and LMR in our study were similar to the findings by other authors [19,25,36].…”
Section: Correlation Between Lmr and The Child-pugh And The Meld/meld...mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The MELD score, which was initially formulated to assess the short-term prognosis of cirrhotic patients undergoing the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [ 8 ], is now widely accepted as a high-potency prognostic scoring system for assessing short-term mortality in a broad spectrum of liver diseases [ 19 21 ], and its dramatic increase over time has also been demonstrated the ability to predict a poor outcome in ACLF patients [ 22 24 ]. However, the use of MELD score alone would underestimate the illness severity and mortality of ACLF patients with hemodynamic derangement, because the MELD score does not contain the assessment of abnormal hemodynamic states which are commonly found in ACLF patients [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performance of an elevated HAv was studied using threshold values ranging from 70 160 cm/s (Table ). Using a threshold of MELD greater than 19, shown to be a helpful cut‐off for the prediction of mortality in high‐risk patients with liver cirrhosis, a HAv threshold of greater than 120 cm/s showed highest accuracy with greatest sensitivity, but a HAv threshold of greater than160 cm/s had the greatest odds ratio of 42.1. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for a threshold of greater than 120 cm/s were 42, 90, 67 and 76%, respectively; and 23, 99, 94 and 73%, respectively, for a threshold of greater than 160 cm/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%