2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41976-019-00023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of Random Forest Classification Based on Phenological Metrics Derived from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 to Map Crop Cover in an Irrigated Semi-arid Region

Abstract: The use of remote sensing data provides valuable information to ensure sustainable land cover management. In this paper, the potential of phenological metrics data, derived from Sentinel-2A (S2) and Landsat 8 (L8) NDVI time series, was evaluated using Random Forest (RF) classification to identify and map various crop classes over two irrigated perimeters in Morocco. The smoothed NDVI time series obtained by the TIMESAT software was used to extract profiles and phenological metrics, which constitute potential e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, significant differences in crop growth status can be observed for each density of the NDVI time series. It is clear that combining S2 and L8 data made it possible to monitor perfectly and continuously the crop development during the season and help further to capture accurate temporal changes while preserving fine-spatial-resolution details, which was previously not achievable by the only use of L8 or S2 data as observed in Figure 5 and consistent with previous studies (Htitiou et al, 2019). This becomes clearer when a sudden change (wheat harvest, or alfalfa cut) in the temporal NDVI profile takes place since it cannot be estimated properly using only the Landsat or sentinel-2 time series.…”
Section: Phenological Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, significant differences in crop growth status can be observed for each density of the NDVI time series. It is clear that combining S2 and L8 data made it possible to monitor perfectly and continuously the crop development during the season and help further to capture accurate temporal changes while preserving fine-spatial-resolution details, which was previously not achievable by the only use of L8 or S2 data as observed in Figure 5 and consistent with previous studies (Htitiou et al, 2019). This becomes clearer when a sudden change (wheat harvest, or alfalfa cut) in the temporal NDVI profile takes place since it cannot be estimated properly using only the Landsat or sentinel-2 time series.…”
Section: Phenological Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It uses random resampling technology and node random splitting technology to construct multiple decision trees, and the final classification result is obtained through voting. Compared with traditional classification algorithms such as Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), the RF algorithm has a faster training speed and a higher degree of intelligence, is not easy to overfit and has high classification accuracy, and is widely used in crop classification and area statistics [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to be selected when debugging the model, and the selection of the hyper-parameters is often complicated, and it usually requires experienced engineers to be able to produce better prediction results. RF, on the other hand, as an ensemble learning algorithm based on decision trees, is widely used not only to solve classification and regression problems, [23][24][25][26][27] but also to handle anomaly detection and clustering problems. [28][29][30][31][32] Relative to artificial neural network modeling, RF modeling is much simpler and only requires to adjust the number of learners, the depth of the tree and the maximum number of features to be able to adjust the better prediction results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%