2015
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of the Date-Randomization Test in Phylogenetic Analyses of Time-Structured Virus Data

Abstract: Rates and timescales of viral evolution can be estimated using phylogenetic analyses of time-structured molecular sequences. This involves the use of molecular-clock methods, calibrated by the sampling times of the viral sequences. However, the spread of these sampling times is not always sufficient to allow the substitution rate to be estimated accurately. We conducted Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of simulated virus data to evaluate the performance of the date-randomization test, which is sometimes used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
199
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An uncorrelated exponential relaxed-clock model 28 provided a better fit than the strict-clock model, indicating the presence of rate variation among lineages. All data sets passed date-randomization tests for temporal structure 810, 29, 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An uncorrelated exponential relaxed-clock model 28 provided a better fit than the strict-clock model, indicating the presence of rate variation among lineages. All data sets passed date-randomization tests for temporal structure 810, 29, 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provided the TMRCAs, and other dates were obtained from the ‘maximum clade credibility tree’, namely the tree that was commonest among those observed. The adequacy of the temporal signal in our data was also checked by using ten independently date-randomized replicates in both the least squared dating (LSD) and BEAST analyses (Ramsden, Holmes and Charleston, 2009; Duchêne 2015). …”
Section: Methods and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each BEAST analysis was run for 50,000,000 to 100,000,000 generations until convergence was achieved, and at least two independent runs were performed for each set of priors. A maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree with mean node (73) and the BEAST analysis repeated. This date randomization test was repeated nine times and compared to the BEAST results with the correctly dated sequences described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%