2011
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.243725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pericardial window: is a video-assisted thoracoscopy approach better than a surgical approach?

Abstract: Pericardial window by video-assisted thoracoscopy is an effective technique for pericardial drainage and biopsy. Apart from its diagnostic value, it allows the physician to fashion a pleuropericardial window for effective drainage while avoiding the complications of classic surgical procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported the recurrence rate of pericardial effusion to be 8% after VATS. In a prospective study [12] including 30 patients, of which 15 (10 with tamponade) underwent VATS and 15 (seven with tamponade) underwent surgical procedure (transthoracic or subxiphoid), no significant difference was found in terms of intra- or postoperative complications, mortality, duration of drainage, duration of hospitalization, and recurrence; however, operative time was reported to be significantly longer in those undergoing VATS. [Becit et al] reported a recurrence rate of 10% within 1 month of subxiphoid surgical pericardiostomy in 368 patients with pericardial effusions (most of them had pericarditis associated with tuberculosis and uremia) and they created a pericardial window by left anterior thoracotomy in these patients with no subsequent recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported the recurrence rate of pericardial effusion to be 8% after VATS. In a prospective study [12] including 30 patients, of which 15 (10 with tamponade) underwent VATS and 15 (seven with tamponade) underwent surgical procedure (transthoracic or subxiphoid), no significant difference was found in terms of intra- or postoperative complications, mortality, duration of drainage, duration of hospitalization, and recurrence; however, operative time was reported to be significantly longer in those undergoing VATS. [Becit et al] reported a recurrence rate of 10% within 1 month of subxiphoid surgical pericardiostomy in 368 patients with pericardial effusions (most of them had pericarditis associated with tuberculosis and uremia) and they created a pericardial window by left anterior thoracotomy in these patients with no subsequent recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires general anesthesia and single-lung ventilation which are difficult to perform on critically ill patients. [13] Pericardiocentesis was not used electively as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality on our patients. It has incomplete diagnostic effectiveness in patients with tuberculous pericarditis and malignant processes invading the pericardium because a sufficient pericardial biopsy specimen cannot be taken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…VATS is increasingly being accepted as the approach of choice over open techniques 2 . The advantages of using 3‐mm needlescopic access and instruments over conventional 10–15‐mm VATS access remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VATS is increasingly being accepted as the approach of choice over open techniques. 2 The advantages of using 3-mm needlescopic access and instruments over conventional 10-15-mm VATS access remain unclear. A recent trial comparing nVATS sympathectomy with standard VATS showed no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative paraesthesia up to a follow up of 40 months between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%