1953
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1953.tb02844.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Permanent Contribution of William James to Psychology*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the validity of citation analysis for historiographical purposes, we sought to evaluate the impact of Watson's study on American psychology, not only by quantifying the citations of his published study but also by comparing them with citations of publications by eight other eminent psychologists of the time: Edward Bradford Titchener (1867–1927), Edward Lee Thorndike (1874–1949), Granville Stanley Hall (1846–1924), James McKeen Cattell (1860–1944), James Rowland Angell (1869–1949), Harvey A. Carr (1873–1954), John Dewey (1859–1952), and William James (1842–1910). These authors, besides being among the best representatives of American psychology in the first decades of the 20th century (Annin, Boring, & Watson, ; Catania, ; Haggbloom et al, ; Heidbreder, ; Knight, ; Simonton, ), were the target of Watson's critique of what he called the “old” psychology. In the specific case of Titchener, it is important to note that he published one of the first criticisms of Watson's Manifesto (Titchener, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the validity of citation analysis for historiographical purposes, we sought to evaluate the impact of Watson's study on American psychology, not only by quantifying the citations of his published study but also by comparing them with citations of publications by eight other eminent psychologists of the time: Edward Bradford Titchener (1867–1927), Edward Lee Thorndike (1874–1949), Granville Stanley Hall (1846–1924), James McKeen Cattell (1860–1944), James Rowland Angell (1869–1949), Harvey A. Carr (1873–1954), John Dewey (1859–1952), and William James (1842–1910). These authors, besides being among the best representatives of American psychology in the first decades of the 20th century (Annin, Boring, & Watson, ; Catania, ; Haggbloom et al, ; Heidbreder, ; Knight, ; Simonton, ), were the target of Watson's critique of what he called the “old” psychology. In the specific case of Titchener, it is important to note that he published one of the first criticisms of Watson's Manifesto (Titchener, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in epistemological terms, this same decision removes James from the probabilistic doctrine used by Darwin in his selective texts (Darwin, 1858(Darwin, , 1859(Darwin, , 1871(Darwin, , 1872. In focusing the selection upon consciousness, James used a model of determinism based on internal causation and upon the naturalization of intention that would accompany much of American psychology during the twentieth century (Knight, 1953;Kinouchi, 2006;Skrupkelis, 2011). This kind of determinism stems from that premise about freedom and the protoganism of the individual's actions over his own destiny and resembles the evolutionary doctrine of Herbert Spencer (cf.…”
Section: Darwinian and Non-darwinian Ideas Of Evolution In William Jamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, James (1890; 1892) adapts Darwin's premises to an analysis centred on the body's individual and mental experience, focusing on the body's private world experience to explain the evolution of instincts and habits. William James proposed an evolutionary theory of emotions as an adaptive function of the organism and a theory of consciousness as a unified and intentional agent (Hart, 1981, Knight, 1953, Valentine, 1991.…”
Section: William James Naturalization Of Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A justificativa para essa escolha é dupla. Em primeiro lugar, os referidos autores figuram entre os mais eminentes representantes da psicologia norte-americana nas primeiras décadas do século XX (Catania, 1999;Ferreri, 2006;Haggbloom et al, 2002;Heidbreder, 1981Heidbreder, /1933Knight, 1953). Além disso, eles foram citados nominalmente por Watson em sua crítica àquilo que entendia como "velha psicologia".…”
unclassified