2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The permanent of a square matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outer sum can then be restricted to x 1 = 1, x i = ±1, i > 1, and the (−1) m replaced by (−1) m−1 . One finds that this corollary is also true for a field F of any characteristic, and it is related to the polarization identity for symmetric m-tensors; see [6,8]. It gives a formula for the permanent that should in general be as fast as Ryser's formula to calculate for larger matrices.…”
Section: Theorem 53 If S Is a Multiset Of Vectors In F M Thenmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The outer sum can then be restricted to x 1 = 1, x i = ±1, i > 1, and the (−1) m replaced by (−1) m−1 . One finds that this corollary is also true for a field F of any characteristic, and it is related to the polarization identity for symmetric m-tensors; see [6,8]. It gives a formula for the permanent that should in general be as fast as Ryser's formula to calculate for larger matrices.…”
Section: Theorem 53 If S Is a Multiset Of Vectors In F M Thenmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is an important example of a polynomial for which no polynomial size circuit is known (even non weakly-skew). Nevertheless, there exist formulas for computing it of much smaller size than the bounds for the general case [25,7]. For instance, Ryser's formula to compute the permanent of a matrix M is…”
Section: Comparison With Quarez's Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If F has characteristic two ( p = 2), the permanent equals the determinant. See [2] and [3] for some of the theory of permanents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%