1966
DOI: 10.2307/973928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Permanent Secretaries: Britain's Top Administrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus whilst biographical studies are available on many political figures, they are notably absent on senior officials – as Normington wryly put it to us, “We rarely write autobiographies”. Furthermore, with some notable exceptions (Barberis, 1994, 1996; Eyvindr, 2012; Harris and Garcia, 1966; Neilson and Otte, 2012; Richards, 1997, 2009; Rhodes, 2005, 2011; Theakston and Fry, 1989) permanent secretaries have been the subject of scant research.…”
Section: What Do We Know Of the Civil Service?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus whilst biographical studies are available on many political figures, they are notably absent on senior officials – as Normington wryly put it to us, “We rarely write autobiographies”. Furthermore, with some notable exceptions (Barberis, 1994, 1996; Eyvindr, 2012; Harris and Garcia, 1966; Neilson and Otte, 2012; Richards, 1997, 2009; Rhodes, 2005, 2011; Theakston and Fry, 1989) permanent secretaries have been the subject of scant research.…”
Section: What Do We Know Of the Civil Service?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9. Richards (1997: 74) summarizes the findings of surveys (Barberis, 1996; Harris and Garcia, 1966; Kelsall, 1955; Theakston and Fry, 1989) of the demographic characteristics of higher civil servants between 1870 and 1995 in terms of ‘shifts in age, gender, class, educational background and length of tenure in office’. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) The difference between the mainstream and an interpretive approach can be shown easily. There is a noteworthy literature on elites, such as permanent secretaries, that assumes we can read off the beliefs and practices of top civil servants from their institutional position and socioeconomic background (e.g., Barberis, 1996;Harris & Garcia, 1966;Richards, 1997;Theakston, 1999Theakston, , 2000Theakston & Fry, 1989). An interpretive approach denies that beliefs and practices can be so determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%