The Permanent Tenckhoff Catheters

Slingeneyer, A

doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1589-6_14

Vascular and Peritoneal Access for Dialysis 1989

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1589-6_14

|View full text |Cite

The Permanent Tenckhoff Catheters

A Slingeneyer¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1996

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 77 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Measurement of Hydrostatic Intraperitoneal Pressure: A Necessary Routine Test in Peritoneal Dialysis

et al. 1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper summarizes our clinical studies on hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure (IPP), showing the interest of this measurement in routine clinical practice. IPP can easily be measured routinely by a simple an d safe method: the measure of the column of dialysate in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) line before drainage, with point 0 located on the midaxillary line. The normal value is 12±2 cm of water (cm H2O) with an intraperitoneal volume (IPV) of 2 L, with linear increases of 2.2 cm H2O for each additional liter. IPP must be measured to estimate the tolerance of IPV: the maximal permissible IPV is reached for an IPP of 18 cm H2O, squaring with a decrease of 200/0 in vital capacity and sometimes arising before clinical symptomatology. However, IPP measured at rest could not predict PD mechanical complications (hernias, dialysis leakages, hemorrhoids, etc.), which are more dependent on parietal previous history or predisposition. IPP is significantly higher during the first three days after peritoneal catheter implantation (17±3 cm H2O) than during the 12 following days (10±4 cm H2O). It is recommended to postpone the start of PD until after catheter implantation, and patients should remain supine for the first three days. On the other hand, IPP strongly reduces the overall ultrafiltration (UF) volume: an increase of 1 cm H2O in IPP caused a decrease of 70 mL in global UF after two hours. Therefore, IPP should be measured in diagnosis of losses of UF. However, UF loss during peritonitis is not due to an increase of IPP.

show abstract

Measurement of Hydrostatic Intraperitoneal Pressure: A Necessary Routine Test in Peritoneal Dialysis

et al. 1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The Permanent Tenckhoff Catheters

Cited by 1 publication

References 77 publications

Measurement of Hydrostatic Intraperitoneal Pressure: A Necessary Routine Test in Peritoneal Dialysis

Measurement of Hydrostatic Intraperitoneal Pressure: A Necessary Routine Test in Peritoneal Dialysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About