2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pernicious role of asymmetric history in negotiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A Fisher's exact test shows that the difference is significant, in line with Hypothesis 6. We know from earlier studies that disagreements are likely to be observed when bargaining parties hold strong and conflicting fairness views or hold on to conflicting reference/focal points and conflicting interpretations of precedents (Babcock et al 1995;Babcock and Loewenstein, 1997;Gächter and Riedl, 2005;Birkeland and Tungodden, 2014;Dezső et al, 2015). We predicted that a variation in time pressure would influence the likelihood/frequency of disagreements.…”
Section: Descriptive Results and Non-parametric Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Fisher's exact test shows that the difference is significant, in line with Hypothesis 6. We know from earlier studies that disagreements are likely to be observed when bargaining parties hold strong and conflicting fairness views or hold on to conflicting reference/focal points and conflicting interpretations of precedents (Babcock et al 1995;Babcock and Loewenstein, 1997;Gächter and Riedl, 2005;Birkeland and Tungodden, 2014;Dezső et al, 2015). We predicted that a variation in time pressure would influence the likelihood/frequency of disagreements.…”
Section: Descriptive Results and Non-parametric Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Below, we explain all important parts in detail. Gächter and Riedl, 2005;Bolton and Karagözoğlu, 2013;Karagözoğlu and Riedl, 2015;Dezső et al, 2015). The quiz consists of 50 multiple choice questions from various fields of knowledge.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wage inequity manipulation involved unmet wage entitlements, which approach builds on Konow (2001), Dezső and Loewenstein (2019), and Dezső, Loewenstein, Steinhart, Neszveda, and Szászi (2015). Konow (2001) reported that observers find wage differences unfair when workers performances are identical and there are no justifiable reasons for unequal wages.…”
Section: Establishing the Wage Inequity Manipulation On The Group Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konow (2001) reported that observers find wage differences unfair when workers performances are identical and there are no justifiable reasons for unequal wages. Similarly, across multiple experiments, Dezső and Loewenstein (2019) and Dezső et al (2015) created asymmetric wage allocations between workers for identical performances with no reason for the wage differences. They found that the lower (i.e., inequitably) paid worker finds hes/her earnings unfair and claims compensation in a subsequent bargaining from the worker receiving the higher wage at his/her expense.…”
Section: Establishing the Wage Inequity Manipulation On The Group Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A teljesség idénye nélkül például Kolozsi ésKutasi, 2018;Vonnák, 2018;Kutasi, 2018;Kolozsi, 2018; Neszveda, 2018; Ábel et al, 2016; Banai és Kolozsi, 2018, Kolozsi et al, 2015 Kutasi,2012a;Kutasi, 2012b; Ambrus et al, 2003; Neszveda és Dezső, 2012;Golovics, 2015;Dezső et al ,2015;Fömötör et al, 2017; Bakó et al. ,2018;Kutasi et al, 2018. 2 Ez a trend a válság óta valamelyest megváltozott, például az Európai Unióban az elmúlt évtizedben csökkent a jövedelmi egyenlőtlenség (Darvas, 2018).…”
unclassified