2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perplexing role of learner control in e‐learning: will learning and transfer benefit or suffer?

Abstract: The appeal of e-learning is not surprising given its many proposed advantages (e.g. flexibility, responsiveness to trainees' individual needs, potential cost-effectiveness). However, as pointed out by Ruël et al., academic research in support of the proposed advantages of electronic human resource management systems is scarce. Although this is generally the case for technologically mediated training, the extant research on e-learning actually questions many of its proposed advantages. In this conceptual piece … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A consistent negative predictor of learning was poorly distributed practice, when students crammed by completing many assignments within a short time frame. We support Granger & Levine's (2010) argument that adult learners often fail to effectively regulate their own learning and argue that instructor-set deadlines help to overcome such regulation failures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…A consistent negative predictor of learning was poorly distributed practice, when students crammed by completing many assignments within a short time frame. We support Granger & Levine's (2010) argument that adult learners often fail to effectively regulate their own learning and argue that instructor-set deadlines help to overcome such regulation failures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The impact of learner control on e‐learning effectiveness has been a research issue for some time (Kraiger & Jerden, ; Williams, ), and learner control has been cited as a major determinant of learning outcomes and satisfaction with e‐learning courses (Clark & Mayer, ; Piccoli, Ahmad, & Ives, ). However, empirical work has so far been unable to establish a clear positive link between learner control and the outcomes of self‐controlled e‐learning courses, suggesting that not all learners are equally capable of making instructional decisions (Granger & Levine, ; Kraiger & Jerden, ). Besides engendering feelings of isolation during the learning process, learner control has been related to increased frustration and anxiety (Chou & Liu, ; Scheiter & Gerjets, ) as well as disorientation and distraction that result from the abundance of information in online learning environments (Anderson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given prior research showing that users are often more satisfied with interactive media (e.g., Teo et al, 2003) but also that cognitive overload can interfere with learning in a multimedia environment (e.g., Moreno & Valdez, 2005;Neiderhauser et al, 2000), these additional measures seemed warranted in order to provide more specific information on why certain slideshow paces might be more or less effective than other paces. If extraneous cognitive load is placed on a user, this load can hamper working memory and consequently one's learning process (e.g., Granger & Levine, 2010).…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%