2010
DOI: 10.1086/605364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Persuasive Role of Incidental Similarity on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in a Sales Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
146
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior work shows that factors such as age and gender can indicate similarity with others, and that similarity leads to affiliative behavior (e.g., McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook 2001;Brown, Grzeskowiak, and Dev 2009;Naylor, Lamberton, and West 2012). For example, actual or inferred similarity between two people (e.g., a shared birthday) can enhance compliance with each other's requests (Burger et al 2004), make online reviews more persuasive (Naylor, Lamberton, and Norton 2011), and increase the perceived social connection between two individuals (Jiang, Hoegg, Dahl, and Chattopadhyay 2010). Taken together, this literature suggests that when a consumer contributes WOM after an individual who is personally similar to her, the consumer should affiliate with this individual.…”
Section: Behavioral and Linguistic Mimicrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work shows that factors such as age and gender can indicate similarity with others, and that similarity leads to affiliative behavior (e.g., McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook 2001;Brown, Grzeskowiak, and Dev 2009;Naylor, Lamberton, and West 2012). For example, actual or inferred similarity between two people (e.g., a shared birthday) can enhance compliance with each other's requests (Burger et al 2004), make online reviews more persuasive (Naylor, Lamberton, and Norton 2011), and increase the perceived social connection between two individuals (Jiang, Hoegg, Dahl, and Chattopadhyay 2010). Taken together, this literature suggests that when a consumer contributes WOM after an individual who is personally similar to her, the consumer should affiliate with this individual.…”
Section: Behavioral and Linguistic Mimicrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we test our model in the context of online reviews, which are a major source of advice for today's consumers (Nielsen 2012) but do not provide an opportunity for continued social interaction, which is assumed in a liking-based explanation of the source-similarity effect (Jiang et al 2010).…”
Section: Overview Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide support for the connectedness-based explanation, prior research has used Lee and Robbins's (1995) Social Connectedness Scale to show that the effect of source similarity is stronger if people have a stronger need for connectedness (Jiang et al 2010). Here we measured participants' need for connectedness using the same scale.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Walton and colleagues (2012) found that interactions with relational others that signal seemingly inconsequential shared characteristics such as birthdates or even membership in arbitrary groups, can lead to increases in individuals'' sense of connectedness-a phenomenon they refer to as "mere belonging". These interactions draw on research showing that knowledge of even incidental similarity can serve to tighten the relational connections between individuals (Burger et al, 2004;Jones et al, 2004;Jiang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Seeking To Belong At Work 12mentioning
confidence: 99%