2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PET-Derived Tumor-to-Liver Standard Uptake Ratio (SUVTLR) Is Superior to Tumor SUVmax in Predicting Tumor Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Abstract: Background: The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) derived from 18 F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT) have some well-known shortcomings in predicting treatment response and prognosis in oncology. The standardized SUVmax with an appropriate reference background may overcome this problem in some instances. This study explored the prognostic value of the tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (SUV TLR) and the tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUV TBR) in predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immediately following PET imaging, mice were sacrificed and organs were isolated for residual 18 F-FDG activity measurement in a well counter. Per standard radiology procedures, organ activity was time-adjusted for decay from the time of injection, normalized to organ weight, then normalized to liver activity [40][41][42] (Figure 5). Two animals were used per time point with the exception of 40 min post-fentanyl, which represents three mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately following PET imaging, mice were sacrificed and organs were isolated for residual 18 F-FDG activity measurement in a well counter. Per standard radiology procedures, organ activity was time-adjusted for decay from the time of injection, normalized to organ weight, then normalized to liver activity [40][41][42] (Figure 5). Two animals were used per time point with the exception of 40 min post-fentanyl, which represents three mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because hepatic FDG metabolism and acquisition parameters on PET/CT can vary among patients, we determined the ratio between SUV max in the gallbladder and in the healthy liver, which we called TLR max . The calculation of tumor-to-liver background activity as a form of standardization has been described in other types of tumors, appearing as a more reliable parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant processes, 29,30 and a better prognostic factor [31][32][33] than SUV max , being also more reproducible among different PET scanners. In the present study, TLR max proved to have a greater statistical significance than SUV max to distinguish benign and malignant pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 18 F-FDG PET parameters, SUVmax, MTV and TLG have been reported to be prognostic in meta-analyses [ 10 , 53 , 54 ]. In the present study, we utilized TLR instead of SUVmax to minimize the effect of heterogeneous 18 F-FDG PET data [ 23 , 55 ]. In accordance with the literature, a high TLR score was associated with worse prognosis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the SUVmax score of the liver was calculated from each patient for normalization by drawing a 3.0-mm-diameter globular region of interest (ROI). The tumor-to-liver SUVmax ratio (TLR) was defined as the tumor SUVmax value divided by the liver SUVmax value [ 24 , 25 ]. The coefficient of variation (COV) is measured as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean, which can be considered as a feature to reflect metabolic heterogeneity [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%