2003
DOI: 10.1109/mnet.2003.1174173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PGM reliable multicast protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our scheme does not rely on feedback suppression via multicasting NAK confirmations, as PGM does. Most of the extensions proposed for PGM [9] are compatible with our own scheme however.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, our scheme does not rely on feedback suppression via multicasting NAK confirmations, as PGM does. Most of the extensions proposed for PGM [9] are compatible with our own scheme however.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The culmination of these efforts is Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) [9], a reliable multicast transport protocol that guarantees that a receiver in the multicast group will either receive all data packets (from their original transmission or a retransmission), or will detect unrecoverable data packet losses. In order to avoid a feedback implosion from the large numbers of receivers towards the sender, PGM relies on two mechanisms: first, only negative acknowledgments (NAKs) are used to report missing packets and, second, a hierarchy of PGM-enabled routers, called network elements (NEs), are deployed throughout the multicast tree to aggregate feedback from the receivers towards the sender.…”
Section: B Reliable Multicastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been huge amount of work in the multicast area with contributions in both the end-to-end category [26,5,20,27] and the router-assisted category [25,14,19,3,11]. For instance, ARM (Active Reliable Multicast) [25] and AER (Active Error Recovery) [14] are two protocols that use a best-effort cache of data packets to permit local recoveries.…”
Section: Case Study: Reliable Multicast On a Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously briefly presented a receiver-driven reliable multicast protocol for the PSI architecture [9]. In this paper, we present our Reliable Multicast Transport for PSI (RMTPSI) in detail, contrast it with Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) [10], a reliable multicast transport protocol designed for IP multicast, and evaluate our protocol's performance against PGM over the PSI architecture. Our results show that RMTPSI is more efficient than PGM, while requiring the same time to complete a reliable transfer; specifically, RMTPSI requires 2.9% to 10.2% fewer downstream and 3.5% to 12.1% fewer total transmissions than PGM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%